Last Pakistani exits Rio Games

This event capped a disappointing Olympic campaign for Pakistan


Our Correspondent August 16, 2016
PHOTO COURTESY: NABIL TAHIR

KARACHI: Pakistan’s Olympic adventures came to an end yesterday when athlete Najma Parveen, the country’s final representative at the Games in Rio, exited the tournament after finishing 70th overall in the women’s 200m race.

A total of nine heats took place and the 22-year-old finished last in the sixth heat with a time of 26.11sec, the third lowest from among the 72 athletes that participated in the heats. The top 24 athletes from all heats qualified for the semi-final, which will be held in three rounds.

Lianna Swan to represent Pakistan in 50m freestyle event at Olympics

This event capped a disappointing Olympic campaign for Pakistan: none of its athletes managed to get past the qualification round.

Shooter Minhal Sohail finished 28th in the qualification round for the women’s 10m air rifle event, while Haris Bandey came last in the men’s 400m freestyle heats to exit the tournament. Judoka Shah Hussain Shah, who got a bye in the round of 64, crashed out of the first round he participated in; losing to Ukraine’s Artem Bloshenko in the round of 32.

24 Pakistani Olympians to watch at Rio 2016

In the men’s 25m rapid fire pistol event, Ghulam Mustafa Bashir finished 18th, while on the same day Lianna Swan, in the women’s 50m freestyle heats, and Mehboob Ali, in the first round of the men’s 400m race, also crashed out.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2016.

COMMENTS (10)

MK | 8 years ago | Reply hmmmmm and both sharp shooters trained with the Pakistan Navy, and Sohail is the daughter of a naval officer. After all this special training, they did not even qualify, this shows itself how brilliant the Navy provides training.
NAMASTE | 8 years ago | Reply @Fahad: 7 atheletes and 15 officials, yes nobody went for a holiday indeed
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ