Aviation giants in dogfight at India airshow

Aero India 2011 has drawn 675 firms and around 40 official delegations from 45 countries to Bangalore.


Afp February 09, 2011
Aviation giants in dogfight at India airshow

BANGALORE: Global aeronautical companies laid out their stalls Wednesday in South Asia’s biggest airshow, looking for a share of billions of dollars in Indian military and civilian contracts.

Aero India 2011 has drawn 675 firms and around 40 official delegations from 45 countries to the southern city of Bangalore, India's aeronautical capital.

The five-day airshow comes less than a month after Indian budget carrier Indigo agreed to a $15.6-billion order for 180 A320 passenger aircraft with Europe's Airbus Industries.

Airbus rival Boeing Co. was among the heavyweights in a particularly strong US corporate contingent at the air show, which coincided with a visit to India by US Commerce Secretary Gary Locke.

"We are seeing explosive growth in India's civil aviation sector. India will be requiring more aircraft in the future, and US companies can provide fuel-efficient technologies which would help reduce fares in the country," Locke said in Bangalore on Tuesday.

Seattle-based Boeing Co. predicted Indian airlines could spend $130 billion dollars in the next two decades on acquisitions.

"We estimate India's annual passenger growth at 15 percent in the next five years will be the highest in the whole world," said Dinesh Keskar, president of Boeing's India subsidiary.

As well as the civilian aviation market, global manufacturers are greedily eyeing a raft of military contracts being offered as part of an ambitious upgrade of the Indian air force.

"Today, India's aerospace sector has emerged as the fastest growing in the world," Defence Minister A.K. Antony said in a speech to open the air show.

"We are open to joint ventures, public-private partnerships and licenced production under transfer of technology," Antony said, adding that India's current defence expenditure -- 2.5 percent of GDP -- was "bound to increase over the next two decades".

Airbus, Boeing, Lockheed Martin Corp. and three other Western firms are all in the running for a $12 billion deal to sell 126 fighter jets to India. The much-awaited contract could to be finalised in July.

"Defence budgets across the world are flat while in India on the other hand it is growing," remarked Mark Kronenberg, vice president in Boeing's defence unit.

"It (India) is an extremely important destination for us," he said.

Stephen Estill, an executive with Sikorsky said the US-based helicopter-maker was competing for a $800 million dollar project to sell 16 anti-submarine helicopters to the Indian navy.

Trials are likely to begin in April, he said.

India's military spending grew from $12 billion dollars in 2000-2001 to nearly $33 billion dollars in 2010-2011, according to government figures.

International consultancy firm KPMG estimates Delhi will hand out military contracts worth $112 billion dollars by 2016.

Pakistan, China and Iran have not been invited to the event.

COMMENTS (15)

Sanjay, Mumbai | 13 years ago | Reply India is big market for aviation industry around world..India is going to be largest buyer of aviation equipment..both for civil and armed forces.. India shud encourage local production of aviation equpment rather than spend our hard earned forex on paying fat salaries to fat obese and racial europeans and americans..time for india to develop aviaion industry and beat these so called giant companies..
Harish Advani | 13 years ago | Reply @Aninda Chowdhury: For some who claims to have been a Legal Consultant you seem quite naive,dare I say even ignorant.The Indian armed forces by far and large have equipment which is obsolete.Being surrounded by 2 hostile neighbors is another compulsion for modernising/updating the armed forces,to enable them to perform effectively in times of crisis.What you advocate is tantamount to dereliction of duty.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ