
Chilcot lays out in forensic detail the nature of the relationship between Blair and Bush, the bypassing of cabinet and parliament, the lack of preparedness militarily, copious and serial advice from intelligence agencies that was flawed or misleading (and went unchallenged). War was not the only option at the time and the peace process was not exhausted, there were no “weapons of mass destruction”, planning for the aftermath of war was either absent or wholly inadequate and the legal basis for going to war had not been satisfactorily made when the ‘go’ button was pushed. The 2003 war in Iraq unleashed a storm of bloody consequences that leave a trail of dead and injured around the world every day, and not only in the Middle East. Horrific as the Chilcot findings are the report itself is to be praised as an example of diligence and accountability almost like no other in modern times. No similar exercise has been carried out in the US and President Obama made it clear than none would be soon after he came to office. Above all Chilcot highlights the weakness of governance, the lack of connectivity and just how easy it is to circumvent the great offices of state — and get away with lying to a nation. The great British public, hugely sceptical at the time of the invasion, are roundly vindicated. The dead have no voice but would be condemnatory of both Bush and Blair if they did. RIP.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 9th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ