Warraich says Moonis Elahi not part of NICL scam

Affidavit from Mohsin Warraich claims Moonis Elahi has no part in the NICL scam.


Express February 02, 2011

Mohsin Warraich, the main accused in the National Insurance Corporation Limited (NICL) scam, claims that Moonis Elahi has no part in the scandal.

This was stated in an affidavit from Mohsin Warraich, a copy of which was recieved by Express 24/7.

The affidavit has been attested by the Pakistan High Commission in London.

Warraich says he received Rs1.68 billion from the NICL after selling his land. But the deal was later cancelled and the amount returned.

Mohsin Warraich has also claimed that the Additional Director-General of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Zafar Iqbal Qureshi misled the court by not presenting the affidavit during the case hearing.

Moonis Elahi was being investigated on charges of receiving Rs220 million out of Rs2.5 billion misappropriated in the National Insurance Company Limited (NICL) land scam.

COMMENTS (18)

Muhammad Waseem | 13 years ago | Reply I appreciate Moonis Elahi that he came back to Pakistan and facing the Judiciary. It is the only example in Pakistan's history that a politician came back to Pakistan from abroad to face the allegations.
Khan | 13 years ago | Reply All these comments above make interesting reading.. and hold some valid points, although all of you seem to be opinionated and don't hold very broad horizons. You all seem to have to made up your mind and have become the judge and jury! Its the mentality of you all that will help mould the next generation. instead of blaming eachother and looking down on one another, try and make a stand, help make a stand and help build a better Pakistan. Take an active stance, I pray that Allah swt does what's best for Pakistan. Those with wealth will answer to Allah swt as to how they accumulated that wealth and how they spend their wealth.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ