Nisar obstructing my rights, alleges Ayyan

Supermodel claims the minister has instructed authorities to ignore court orders


Our Correspondent June 21, 2016
Ayyan Ali. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: Ayyan Ali has alleged that interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan is obstructing her fundamental rights of liberty, property and freedom.

In response to the petition submitted by the ministry to Sindh High Court, Ayyan’s counsel Sardar Latif Khosa submitted a reply on Monday. The reply further states, “Successive and unabated illegal attempts to harass Ayyan Ali leaves no room for doubt that the hideous hands are too powerful for the officials who sheepishly danced to the tunes of their masters”

Travel ban: Ayyan files contempt of court plea against interior secretary and others

Ayyan believes that the case portrays a classic example of fraud and deception played upon the highest courts of the country. She contends that if the superior court orders are not implemented the rule of law of the country stays annihilated.

“A young individual carrying the flag of showbiz, projecting the soft image of Pakistan, is constantly made to run from pillar to post seeking the enforcement of her fundamental rights. Although the courts have granted the verdicts in her favour, the judicial orders have been rubbished and the respondent (interior secretary) has overturned such orders,” says the reply.

Money-laundering case: FBR seeks permission to probe Ayyan’s sources of income

She has also objected the placement of her name on the ECL for the third time over her alleged involvement in the murder of investigating Officer Ijaz Mehmood. The reply submitted says that, “The tell-tale story is false as Ayyan Ali was in jail under the heaviest surveillance when Ijaz Mahmood was assaulted.” The reply states that Ayyan’s name is based on total perversity.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 21st, 2016.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ