The realities of today

There can be no half measures in this matter. A border is either regulated or it is not


Editorial June 19, 2016
Torkham border. PHOTO: AFP

Pakistan was still a part of India when the Durand Line was drawn in 1893, and it was the subject of controversy then and it remains so today. Both Pakistan and Afghanistan may want for differing or contiguous reasons to see the line redrawn to reflect modern realities, but the reality that is inescapable is that it is an officially-recognised international border, and the likelihood of that changing in the foreseeable future is remote to say the least. Pakistan has a significant security problem linked to the fact that the border between it and Afghanistan is largely unregulated and poorly policed or monitored. It is 2,430km (1,510 miles) long and wide open for much of that. The Torkham crossing, currently the focus of tension and military action by both sides, is the busiest point of transit. Until June 1 this year, Afghans were allowed to pass without any form of paperwork but Pakistan decided to change that and trouble has ensued.

There can be no half measures in this matter. A border is either regulated or it is not. Nation-states everywhere have some sort of basic identity check — less so within the states of the European Union — and paperless transit rights are virtually unheard of elsewhere in the world. Afghanistan may plead ‘special case’ on the basis of an inconvenient and manifestly unfair historical decision; but the security imperatives of Pakistan have to override that. Now Kabul has declined the invitation to send its national security adviser and foreign minister to Pakistan for talks aimed at a resolution of the current conflict, instead opting for lower-grade representation, which may be interpreted as acting with something less than sincerity regarding negotiations.



The gate that Pakistan is constructing is 37 metres inside its own territory. It ought to be completed and other gates built at other choke points along the line in order to better regulate the flow. Afghanistan itself appears to have little interest — or perhaps limited capacity — when it comes to regulation on its own side of the border, but it cannot fall back on the crutch of history with terrorists wandering back and forth at will. While it is important that the two governments attempt to reach consensus on this issue to avoid conflict, Pakistan remains well within its rights to build the gates.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 20th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (5)

quatro | 8 years ago | Reply @Arslan Rai:
Please fence the border and place mines so illegal afghans get a taste of some high explosives on their way here.
Really? Afghanistan and the USA has begged Pakistan to control it's border for the past 15+ years - not to control trade - but to control the flow of terrorist who cross from their sanctuaries inside Pakistan to slaughter Afghan civilians and try and overthrow the elected govt of Afghan. Maybe you should walk a mile in Afghan shoes some time to get a different perspective on the policies of Pakistan.
KPK Zhagh | 8 years ago | Reply But the predictions of tomorrow are 1-Trump, the presidential candidate of US.has said that American presence in Afghanistan is necessary to keep an " eye" on neighboring Pakistan's nuclear assets.And this guy is likely to win. 2- Pakistan's access to central Asia seems to be through longer path via Kashghar, not Afghanistan,the shorter and more economical path 3- Afghanistan might not remain neutral in any future war between Pakistan and India as it did in earlier Indo-Pak wars.And this might result in the "no Line" between Pashtuns
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ