Imran admits owning offshore company to ‘avoid UK taxes’

PTI chief clarifies he bought a flat through an offshore firm in 1984 as he was not a British citizen


News Desk May 13, 2016
PTI chairman Imran Khan. PHOTO: FILE

A day after Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) spokesperson denied that the party chief owned an overseas holding, Imran Khan admitted he formed an offshore company in 1983 during his cricketing years in London.

Speaking to reporters at London Heathrow Airport, Imran said he formed the offshore firm on the advice of his accountant to "avoid UK taxes".

"I was already paying 35 per cent tax on my income there, so to avoid further taxes, I bought the flat through an offshore firm, which was my right as I was not a British citizen," he said, adding, “There is no illegality in it.”

Leaked documents from the Mossack Fonseca law firm in Panama last month showed premier’s children – Hassan, Hussain and Maryam – owned at least three offshore holding companies registered in the British Virgin Islands.

Detractors say no way out for Nawaz

Earlier, the PTI chief, being a critic of the incumbent government, had categorically said, “The only reason people opened offshore accounts was to either hide wealth or evade tax.”



According to the United Kingdom’s official land registry records, Imran’s property – a flat in South Kensington was registered in the name of ‘Niazi Services Limited’ of Jersey, Channel Island, on May 3 1984. The flat was sold in March 2003 for £715,000.

Jersey of Channel Island is one of the havens for offshore companies.

In reaction to Imran’s statement, PML-N leader Maryam Nawaz called the PTI chairman “the pioneer of offshore companies”.

COMMENTS (51)

Pak_Patriot | 7 years ago | Reply @H Chaudhry: Accountability starts at the top: the PM. He cannot question others when he is himself questionable and no answers have been provided. Others are not PM nor responsible for the country's finances; they come later.
Pak_Patriot | 7 years ago | Reply @Humza: Panama Papers prove NS and family did not declare assets in the 90s which were owned by these OFCs. That itself is a crime. He also has not been able to show the money trail; whether the money used to setup these OFCs was tax paid, sent legally or not. For someone who is not corrupt, this should be easy. For someone who is, this is a big headache. IK never hid the asset owned by his OFC, the London flat was declared as his. He merely used the OFC to avoid capital gains tax on property which is perfectly legal. Sharifs used their OFCs to hide wealth, evade tax. That is NOT legal.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ