US woman sues Starbucks for $5 mn over ice in cold drinks

Stacy Pincus accuses world's biggest coffee retailer of serving its customers 'much less than advertised fluid...


Afp May 03, 2016
PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON DC: A Chicago woman is suing Starbucks for more than $5 million, claiming the coffee giant is underfilling its popular hand-blended iced coffee, tea and other drinks, making customers overpay for beverages.

In a lawsuit seeking a jury trial and class action status, alleging false advertising and consumer fraud, Stacy Pincus accuses the world's biggest coffee retailer of serving its customers "much less than advertised -- often nearly half as many fluid ounces."

Starbucks opens first cafe in sub-Saharan Africa

"As a result of this practice, Starbucks's cold drinks contain significantly less product than advertised, by design and corporate practice and procedure," the suit filed last week says.

Starbucks baristas typically fill cold-drink plastic cups to the top black line printed on the cups and the rest with ice.

Pincus says that since April 2006, she and millions of other Starbucks customers have been defrauded because Venti cup customers get only 14 ounces (0.4 liters) of beverage -- the amount of liquid obtained when filling cups to the top line -- even though menus state a 24-ounce total.

"Starbucks includes these three black lines on its cold drink cups to ensure that its employees fill these cups with less fluid ounces than are advertised on Starbucks's menu for a given cold drink," the lawsuit says.

"In fact, Starbucks instructs its employees to provide its customers with fewer fluid ounces than advertised."

Starbucks to donate unsold meals to hungry

Pincus is also challenging Starbucks's pricing, saying it charges more for cold drinks than hot ones.

An average Grande Iced Coffee, advertised as a 16-ounce drink, costs $2.65, while a hot Grande Freshly Brewed Coffee costs $2.10.

"Essentially, Starbucks is not only underfilling its cold drinks compared to how they are advertised, but it is charging a premium price for them as well," the filing reads.

"Starbucks's cold drinks are underfilled to make more money and higher profits, to the detriment of consumers who are misled by Starbucks's intentionally misleading advertising practices."

Starbucks dismissed the lawsuit as "frivolous and without merit."

"Our customers understand and expect that ice is an essential component of any 'iced' beverage," the coffee giant said in a statement.

Why Saudis are now working at Starbucks and McDonald’s

"If a customer is not satisfied with their beverage preparation, we will gladly remake it."

Starbucks, which boasts more than 23,000 stores worldwide, reported $19.2 billion in net revenue during fiscal 2015, a 16.5 percent increase from the previous year.

Beverages accounted for 73 percent of sales in the company's stores last year.

COMMENTS (8)

Rollin & Trollin | 7 years ago | Reply @Hasan Mehmood: The way I see it you both are quibbling for nothing, though both of you make valid points. In the final analysis, most likely Starbucks will be slapped with a fine but probably significantly less than $5 million, but they will continue to serve the same amount of ice but asked to fairly advertise the amount of actual non-ice fluid for the various glass sizes. Alternatively, Starbucks may reduce the glass sizes for iced drinks.
Hasan Mehmood | 7 years ago | Reply @Haji Atiya: Please do not try to defend the indefensible. It is a very smart play on words but unethical nevertheless. Never ever saw any pure juice except in home or 5 star restaurants. All commercially available juices are only 20~40 % concentrate. Have you never drank pure apple / orange / carrot juice extracted in home without lots of ice? Any problem? And is Pepsi also very thick and can't be taken without ice. You advertise 24 oz iced drink. You give 24 oz drink topped with sufficient ice cubes to qualify as an iced drink. Period. There is absolutely no hint or indication regarding quantum of ice. So it can be 10 % or even 50% and you can't complain. Sounds ridiculous? It is.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ