18th Amendment: Education ministry’s plea to stop its devolution denied

Implementation Commission says the move would be unconstitutional.

Peer Muhammad January 25, 2011

ISLAMABAD: The implementation commission on the 18th constitutional amendment has turned down a request to retain the federal education ministry, saying the move would be deemed unconstitutional after the passage of the landmark piece of legislation.

The commission’s chief Senator Raza Rabbani refused to entertain the education ministry’s plea and listed reasons for its devolution to the provinces.

The commission stated that the 18th Amendment Act 2010 has deleted the concurrent legislative list, and continuation of any function mentioned in the list by the federal government would be considered unconstitutional.

Moreover, the executive authority of the federation extends only to the subjects enumerated in the federal legislative list as provided under Article 97 of the constitution.

The commission noted that the decision had been taken after considering all aspects of the matter and subsequently the recommendations were approved by parliament.

It contended that any review in the amendment is the prerogative of parliament and unless it approves the restoration of entry in the concurrent list, the subject does not fall under the executive powers of the federal government.

The commission stated that retaining provincial subjects at the federal level would be in violation of the constitution.

The ministry, in its letter, had argued that the devolution of the ministry would lead to non-uniformity in the curriculum of the provinces. This, in turn, would result in deterioration of education standards and would create multiple education systems in the country.

The commission replied that the development of the curriculum and syllabi had always been with the provinces and the federal government was only vetting and providing ‘No-Objection Certificates (NOCs)’ to the curriculum developed by the provinces. It further stated that no extraordinary capacity was available with federal government institutions to determine these matters, adding that the provinces have the required capability to take over the responsibility to safeguard the national interest.

In response to the point that federal ministries existed in foreign countries, the commission contended that every country has its own constitution and many international practices envisage no role for the federal government in primary and secondary education. The commission also cited that a good number of developed countries do not have education ministries at the federal level.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 25th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (2)

T.L.W | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend take over the responsibility to safeguard the national interest Wow, talk about an utterly stupid sentence to be used in relation to education. We want educated citizens, not indoctrinated drones. As for the provinces capacities, I am of two minds about this. First, I think a de-Zia-ification of propaganda, especially from History, should have taken place at the federal level. After that, the ministries should have been transferred to the provinces. Barring that, I think this is better as the smaller provinces will likely include some semblance of their own unique history within the federation, and this will expand children`s minds to think more broadly about our country, which I must remind everybody, is the 6th most populous country on the planet. A little broadness of mind would be helpful.
Muhammad Uzair Sukhera | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend Are provinces capable enough to handle the post graduate studies? The number of PhDs in country can be counted! .... Seems like our focus is only basic education. NO need of more education. Its an excess right? "Damagh ooncha ho jata hai!"
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story