India says Koh-e-Noor diamond belongs to Britain

108-carat Koh-i-Noor gem is the subject of a historic ownership dispute, claimed by at least four countries


Afp April 18, 2016
PHOTO: REUTERS

NEW DELHI: A priceless diamond that is part of Queen Elizabeth's crown was given to Britain and not stolen, India's government on Monday told the Supreme Court, which is hearing a suit seeking its return.

The 108-carat Koh-i-Noor gem, which came into British hands during the colonial era, is the subject of a historic ownership dispute and has been claimed by at least four countries including India.

But India's Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar said the 19th-century Sikh king Ranjit Singh had given the stone to the British.

LHC accepts petition seeking return of Koh-e-Noor diamond from British Queen

"It was given voluntarily by Ranjit Singh to the British as compensation for help in the Sikh Wars. The Koh-i-Noor is not a stolen object," he told the Supreme Court.

The court was hearing a suit filed by the All India Human Rights & Social Justice Front, a non-governmental organisation, seeking the diamond's return.

It asked the solicitor general to file an affidavit giving the government's stance on the issue.

The stone was presented to Queen Victoria in 1850 after the Anglo-Sikh wars in which Britain gained control of the Sikh empire of the Punjab, which is now split between Pakistan and India.

Singh in turn had taken it from an Afghan king who had sought sanctuary in India.

Britain to India: Koh-i-Noor diamond is ours

The diamond had been an heirloom of the Afghan monarchy and before then was in Persian royal hands, but its true origins remain a mystery.

Its name translates as "Mountain of Light" and it is traditionally worn by a queen -- it is said to bring bad luck to any man who wears it.

In 1976 Britain refused a request to cede the diamond, citing the terms of the Anglo-Sikh peace treaty.

"I could not advise Her Majesty the Queen that it should be surrendered," said Jim Callaghan, prime minister at the time.

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron has also said he would oppose returning the diamond.

"If you say yes to one you suddenly find the British Museum would be empty," he told NDTV television in 2010.

"It is going to have to stay put."

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (3)

RB | 5 years ago | Reply It is not what India says.. it is an argument from Ranjit Kumar TO the supreme court of India. Supreme court of India would decide what stand should be taken and would probably advise government of India on what to do... Same thing happens in our country... An argument from a lawyer does not become voice of the nation...
Raw is War | 5 years ago | Reply Mohammed Ghori took away the wealth from Many temples from Gujarat. Should we collect the equavalent fine from Arabs?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ