![the writers are world bank country director for pakistan and senior director of the global practice on poverty and equity respectively the writers are world bank country director for pakistan and senior director of the global practice on poverty and equity respectively](https://i.tribune.com.pk/media/images/2251759-editorialxfinalfix-15932815781594457933-0/2251759-editorialxfinalfix-15932815781594457933-0.jpg)
This new poverty line acknowledges that as societies develop, the minimum standards for a productive life, for personal dignity and for social acceptability also change — and all societies that aim to build democratic and inclusive polities must respond to such changes by raising the consumption floor for all. This is what Pakistan did last week, and it is very significant.
It is also very timely. Pakistan has seen a rapid and consistent decline in poverty since 2001, with the headcount poverty rate falling from close to 35 per cent, to well under 10 per cent by 2014, the most recent year for which data is available. Though a more comprehensive analysis of the drivers of this process and its sustainability is necessary, there can be little argument that Pakistan is a different country today than it was in 2001. In the past decade and a half, Pakistan has seen rapid urbanisation, significant infrastructure growth, substantial movement of labour to the non-farm sector, and massive increases in private remittance inflows by Pakistani workers. Remittances, which tend to benefit poorer households more, have likely fuelled a good bit of the decline in poverty. This pattern of declining poverty and large remittance flows is also not unique to Pakistan. It is a story that is playing out in much of South Asia, where most countries are also poised to update their poverty lines.
Pakistan’s people have also changed the way they spend and what they own — something that we often see when poverty declines. For example, 18 per cent of the poorest households now own motorcycles, compared to just 2 per cent fifteen years ago; the number of households without any type of toilet has been cut in half — from close to 60 per cent, to about 30 per cent among the poorest; and even the least advantaged families in Pakistan have moved towards a more diverse diet, with a greater consumption of dairy, meat, and fruits and vegetables. This has also brought the rural diet into much closer alignment with urban food preferences and tastes, as often happens with development.
Last week’s announcement also settles the decade-long confusion on the trend in poverty in Pakistan. The government has officially released both the old and the new poverty lines and poverty rates and committed itself to tracking both going into the future. The back casting of the new line also reiterates that it really does set a higher bar. This new poverty line would have implied a poverty rate of 64 per cent in 2001, rather than the official rate of 34.5 per cent based on the old line. Both lines show the same declining trend in poverty over the past 15 or so years, however, the new rate is always substantially higher than the old one — precisely because it casts the net wider and brings more of the relatively disadvantaged into the fold of targeted development programs.
However, the true fruits of poverty reduction will only be fully evident when the quality of public service delivery rises to meet the growing needs of the population, and key services are accessible to all. Pakistan now needs to scale up its efforts on this front. There are a number of critical areas such as child stunting and maternal mortality, for example, where despite the reduction in poverty, progress has been slow. Lack of progress on stunting has also been used to question the decline in poverty. However, stunting is only partially a food deficit, and thus a poverty issue. It is equally, if not more, about sanitation and safe drinking water — largely public service delivery issues.
The World Bank remains committed to working with the government of Pakistan to continue the strong progress on poverty reduction and move the needle on key development indicators, using both development assistance and high quality evidence and analysis to make programs and policies more effective for those who need them the most.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 11th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ