Russian seeking bride in Chitral for Rs1 million arrested

Apelgans Viacheslov, a 28-year-old from Moscow, had put up posters in the northern district of Chitral


Afp April 02, 2016
PHOTO: Reuters

CHITRAL: A Russian national who came to Pakistan in search of a wife has been arrested and is being questioned by intelligence agencies, officials said Saturday.

Apelgans Viacheslov, a 28-year-old from Moscow, had put up posters in the northern district of Chitral advertising his dream of marrying a local woman and offering a one million rupees ($9,550) reward to anybody who could help him achieve it, district police chief Asif Iqbal said.

No hope of survivors in avalanche near Chitral

"The Russian national had embraced Islam for his dream and his new name is Turud Ali," he told AFP, saying the poster featured a picture of the Russian and the address of the hotel he was staying at.

The Russian was arrested for failing to register with Chitral police station, as foreigners are required to do for security reasons when visiting the area, Iqbal said.

A local security official confirmed the arrest.

"He said he wants to marry a local woman and settle here," the security official told AFP, asking not to be named.

Stuck in time: Stranded passengers finally reach Chitral

He said a joint investigation team of the police and intelligence agencies has been formed to investigate the Russian.

The security official said the man also visited Chitral last December.

Officials did not say why intelligence agencies were questioning him.

Chitral, a remote district bordering Afghanistan, is a tourist hotspot famous for its landscape and for being home to the Kalash people, an animistic tribe and Pakistan's smallest religious minority.

COMMENTS (5)

Muhibullah | 8 years ago | Reply Release Turud Ali immediately
Hassan | 8 years ago | Reply Or maybe he wants to take her bride back to Russia and sell her for prostitution.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ