An unhelpful development

A spanner has been thrown into the works in the form of some distinctly unhelpful comments by Indian Defence Minister


Editorial March 02, 2016
Indian security personnel stand guard next to a barricade outside the Indian Air Force (IAF) base at Pathankot in Punjab, India, January 2, 2016. PHOTO: REUTERS

After the weeks since the attack on the Pathankot base of the Indian air force on January 2, the governments on both sides have displayed commendable restraint. The traditional finger-pointing and name-calling has been largely eschewed for a more measured, indeed more statesmanlike, approach by both the leaders and the administrations of each state. The attack, as was surely intended, disrupted the talks that were ‘in process’ but did not actually derail them as would have been the case in the past. The work went on at secretary level behind the scenes and the expectation was that talks would be resumed in the not-so-distant future.



Now a spanner of an entirely different kind has been thrown into the works in the form of some distinctly unhelpful comments by the Indian Defence Minister — and senior cabinet member — Manohar Parrikar. It was he who informed the Indian Upper House, the Rajya Sabha, that militants could not have carried out the attack on the Pathankot air base without the support of the Islamabad government. This is a very serious accusation to make without anything by way of supporting evidence, at least not in the public domain.

Mr Parrikar’s comments came in response to a somewhat disingenuous question put by Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut, who asked if the Indian government believed that this was “just a terror attack” or was it “done with the help of the Pakistan Army”. No comment could be more incendiary under the prevailing circumstances, and one wonders whether the purpose of the question was to derail the talks in the same way as those that carried out the attack sought to derail them. The reply contained the allegation that no non-state actor could operate in Pakistan without the support of the state — a scurrilous accusation at best, a destructive one at worst. Some oil was poured on troubled waters by the Indian minister of state for home in the Lok Sabha who pointed out that for the first time, Pakistan has taken affirmative action on the basis of information provided by India and registered a case. Unwise words cannot be unsaid, and we urge restraint and yes, some judiciously applied statesmanship.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 3rd, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (3)

3rdRockFromTheSun | 8 years ago | Reply Just yesterday, Mr Sartaj Aziz finally acknowledged the fact that Pakistan has been hosting the Afghanistan Taliban 'leadership' in Pakistan and had provided them and their families safe haven as well as medical facilities - something which had been alleged by the Americans / Afghans / Indians for a long time; but had been denied by the Pakistani govt for all these years! So in the light of that - does Mr. Parikar's statement so far fetched?
khattak | 8 years ago | Reply "No non-state actor could operate in Pakistan without the support of the state", Isn't it true.or plausible denial would do? Indian has the capability to advertise us as terrorist state in 4 corners of the world
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ