Fragile but holding

Published: February 28, 2016
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks during a TV interview in Damascus, Syria in this still image taken from a video on November 29, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks during a TV interview in Damascus, Syria in this still image taken from a video on November 29, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

There are 97 fighting groups in Syria that as of midnight local time on February 26 have agreed to “a cessation of hostilities”. This is the first time in five years of bitter conflict that such a deal has been brokered. It is neither a peace treaty nor anything close to it and is scheduled to last for two weeks. The hope is that peace may take hold in that time. The ‘cessation’ does not apply to the fight against the al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State (IS). The deal has been brokered by the US and Russia with the latter country the senior partner and very much the future determinant in terms of the continuity of ‘cessation’. There is every expectation that there will be breaches of the ceasefire and contingency plans are in place to deal with them as and when they occur.

In Syria any light is better than no light. The civil war has triggered crises across a swathe of countries from Turkey to the western-most reaches of the European Union, as well as feeding the voracious conflicts that ripple along the Maghrib and Levant. The IS has carved itself a chunk of territorial control and Russia, despite its sponsorship of the ceasefire, continues to support the Assad regime, bombing its opponents up to the last minute before the truce came into effect. Many observers are rightly sceptical, but if the first few days can pass without a major breakdown then hope is alive; and perhaps peace talks in Geneva can commence on March 7. Even a partial de-escalation may do something to stem the flood of refugees that are currently ripping up the Schengen Agreement as they march ever onwards, the flow not occluded by winter as had been supposed. In Syria itself, there is the world’s largest humanitarian emergency. Entire cities are on the verge of starvation. Children have died of hunger. The war has proved to be a magnet for radicalised men and women — including from Pakistan let it not be forgotten — from across the globe, the bacteria for future infection in their home countries. The world will hold its breath as the ceasefire goes ahead.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 28th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (1)

  • Toti calling
    Feb 28, 2016 - 2:12AM

    It is only a ceasefire and not a peace treaty which can result in a single harmonious Syria. All the actors are fighting for their self interst at the cost of death and misery for millions. America has only one aim: to get rid of Assad and Turkey wants Kurds not to win, although they are more secalar and fighting a common enemy IS. What Iran and Saudis are up to is confusing. We can blame others, but if Syrians could talk to each other and decide to have a common goal to achieve democracy and rule of law, things would not have gone so far. All I can say is that even a faulty democracy could have saved Syria. Now many are already talking of plan B which is to divide it 3 countries.I am sure America and Israel will not be too unhappy if that happens. Recommend

More in Editorial