Musharraf wanted PPP out in 2008: Khursheed Shah

Published: February 22, 2016



ISLAMABAD: Like 2002, the second general elections held under Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf also resulted in a hung parliament, leaving powerbrokers enough room for manoeuvring in 2008.

Except in Sindh, where the PPP emerged as a dominant force, no party was in a position to form a government of its own.

Safe exit for Musharraf: MP Dasti says witnessed deal between PPP, PML-N

In the elections – held just two months after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto – the PPP grabbed the highest number of seats in the National Assembly, but it was still short of forming a majority government.

Ultimately, the Asif Zardari-led PPP came to power and ruled the country for the next five years before it suffered an embarrassing rout in the 2013 general elections.

The Express Tribune interviewed Syed Khursheed Shah, the incumbent leader of opposition in the National Assembly who was among the insiders in the power corridors of the government after 2008 polls.

According to Shah, then president Musharraf wanted the PPP to make an alliance with the Chaudhry Shujaat-led PML-Q. The military ruler also offered his smaller allied parties, including members from FATA and JUI-F, to form a government in the Centre and Punjab. The condition was to keep PML-N out of the equation.

Musharraf’s former mediaman joins PPP

The PPP weighed its options and decided to go for the opposite, forming a coalition with the PML-N in the Centre and Punjab. The relationship, however, did not last long.

“Musharraf offered us the government in Punjab and to install our own chief minister,” Shah recalls. “He said he would give us the necessary numbers in the Centre and Punjab both. But do not take along the PML-N.”

Under Musharraf’s offer, the PML-Q was to support the PPP in Punjab. The PPP had won 110 provincial seats with the PML-Q grabbing 80 seats before disintegrating into several factions.  In the Centre, the PML-Q had 55 votes, and with FATA’s 10 members and the JUI-F lawmakers, it could have given majority to the PPP. The MQM was also there on the backup.

“Musharraf thought if the PPP came to power with his support, he could remain in power and continue to call the shots,” Shah says. “He would have used his allied parties to keep us under pressure… by bringing in one party and taking out another from the coalition.”

The opposition leader believes working under a military general president would have brought a bad name to his party. “The PPP had a choice: either to sacrifice Punjab or revive the Constitution,” Shah says. “We considered all options. We thought if we make a general stronger now, he might give us Punjab. But you never know, if he kicks us out after six months or a year, we will be standing nowhere.” Giving the reasons for adding PML-N to the coalition and giving it the Punjab government, the former minister says with Musharraf as president, the PPP could not have amended the Constitution and gotten rid of Article 58-2B… a promise  the PPP had made with the people.

But the coalition did not last long. The PML-N quit the Centre, protesting the PPP was not fulfilling its promise of restoring the then chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who was deposed by Musharraf for a second time in November 2007.

A year on: Govt may shelve Musharraf’s treason trial

Meanwhile, the PPP started its efforts to get rid of Musharraf. The PML-N was contacted to secure its support in case the general remained adamant and needed to be removed through impeachment.

Shah claims after getting the nod from Nawaz, the PPP sent a message to Musharraf asking him to step down. The message was conveyed through then national security adviser Maj Gen (retd) Mahmud Ali Durrani.

“Musharraf immediately contacted then chief justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, telling him he will use his powers under 58-2B, pack the assemblies and go for new elections,” the PPP leader said, recalling his conversations with Dogar. “He sought support from the CJP to indemnify the move.”

According to Shah, the CJP told Musharraf if he approved his move to dissolve the assemblies, the “masses would kill him” as he was already facing the public’s wrath for siding with him.

This stopped Musharraf from taking the ultimate step and the PPP started building pressure on him to quit.

Shah narrated an interesting meeting between Asif Zardari and Nawaz Sharif at Zardari House in Islamabad, where the two discussed options to impeach Musharraf. “The PML-N started showing its colours and laid down preconditions in exchange for supporting the PPP in case it went for impeachment,” he said.

“I don’t exactly remember everything but there were many conditions,” he says. “While the PPP chief agreed to everything [put forward by the PML-N], it was Raza Rabbani and I who protested.”

The PPP leader recalled another instance of Zardari outwitting Nawaz once the decision to remove Musharraf had been finalised. After their formal meeting was over, the PML-N chief talked about his desire to assume the presidential office.

“Nawaz said Zardari sb since there will be no [Article] 58-2B, the president’s office will be a minor post. ‘Why not give it to us?’ Nawaz said,” Shah said. “In his usual candid tone Zardari sb replied, ‘I know that and I present my services for this office most humbly’.” The answer from Zardari wrapped up the conversation.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 22nd,  2016.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (7)

  • Sodomite
    Feb 22, 2016 - 11:21AM

    Very interesting to see how Nawaz Sharif and Zardari operate. Even more significant is how lost the Great Strategist was. Swaying in the breeze. How he got to be COAS beats me.Recommend

  • Anoni
    Feb 22, 2016 - 11:27AM

    For every thing he did good .. just one thing outweighs his goods and that is NRO

    We are now suffering this NRO after effects.Recommend

  • Syed
    Feb 22, 2016 - 12:42PM

    I wish Mushraf had not done the NRO and kicked them out for good.
    Looks what have they done to the country. Corruption is rampant and in each department.

    I am not for Military rule, but honestly tell me, do we have a choice?

    Every time the country is run by Politicians, we end up in either loosing one part of the country or in heavy debt and destruction of institutions.Recommend

  • Aslam
    Feb 22, 2016 - 3:15PM

    Like every other political leader in our country, Mr. Shah also loves to make unsubstantiated claims which can never be verified. One just hopes and pray that the people of Pakistan start to see through these idiotic claims and devise a way to narrate the history truthfully. Otherwise, as the saying goes, nations who disfigure history get disfigured by nature itself. Perhaps this is what’s happening to us.Recommend

  • kahn
    Feb 22, 2016 - 5:57PM

    so, observe this….

    he remembers everything, but when it comes to mention what Shareef’s demands were, he has somehow, out of the blue moon, forgotten that very bit, but remembers everything else.

    amazes me… he thinks we are idiots.Recommend

  • Analysis
    Feb 22, 2016 - 7:58PM

    Shah seems to be lamenting as to why PML-N is not paying back for bringing the latter to power in Punjab, which as he admits was the cost to boot out Musharraf from power. How could PPP could have had it both ways? Not possible.
    However, Shah should admit that it was PPP’s horrible performance during its 2008-2013 tenure that caused its rout in the 2013 elections.
    PPP’s policy of deliberating singling out Punjab for a step motherly treatment cost it heavily in the Punjab and thus it could not return to power in 2013.
    Even, since, the PPP’s performance in Sindh is horrendous with babies dying in Thar and its step motherly treatment of Karachi, which it wants to grab through turf wars. Pathetic.
    (Not a supporter of any political party, not a Punjabi.)Recommend

  • Jeiy Shah of Sindh
    Feb 22, 2016 - 8:14PM

    Dear Hon Khursheed Shah, enough of Mil bashing. NRO spoke volumes of PPP’s valor. This is not the time to encourage intrigues. Once again PPP is looking for an ‘enemy’ real or virtual to claim it is the victim. And very cleverly, you are pulling PML-N with you.

    Please focus on whatever is left in your care- few districts of dusty rural Sindh. Let this country move on before some serious accident takes place- 60 % of 200 million youth is looking to politicians to mak a difference in their lives. What happened in the Middle East is well known to all.

    Please back off and let people move on. Recommend

More in Pakistan