The war of narratives

Pakistanis have long believed in the narrative that their country is a gift of God for Muslims

IKRAM HOTI February 09, 2016

Can Pakistan ever successfully develop an effective counter-extremist narrative? Would this help in changing the present self-destructive national course we have taken under the existing narrative? These questions are very relevant in the Pakistan of today. It is important to ask a few more questions here: did the existing narrative intensify the terrorist build-up in Pakistan by reinforcing terrorist organisations? If yes, does this narrative push Pakistan further along its self-destructive course? How does the existing narrative impact our impressionable youth? How does it turn them into foot-soldiers of terrorist organisations? And what kind of alternative narrative can help Pakistan change its course for the better?

Even if a new narrative can help, it is not easy to articulate or develop it. The present narrative is rooted in a paradigm promoting the sense that Pakistan is not a regular, normal state but a gift of God to Muslims of the subcontinent. According to this narrative, Pakistan has been under threat from external actors from the very moment of its inception and it needs to be saved and hence our national security state structure.

Pakistan's tryst with counter-terrorism

Those urging the development of a counterterror narrative assert that it should represent a new policy and a fresh standing of Pakistan in the comity of nations under a new perspective on nationhood, statehood and democracy. The present narrative, on the other hand, is of the view that we face the choice between either surviving as a nation or holding on to a democratic system — deeming the two mutually exclusive in the Pakistani context.

Lately, the official version on terrorism has started asserting that Pakistan is threatened more by internal forces than external ones. The instruments of internal forces that torment Pakistan are extremism and terrorism. However, while the National Action Plan has been launched with the resolve that the present narrative will be scrapped, it does not allow the scrapping of our security paradigm and policy that are at the root of this narrative.

Want Pakistan to expand counter-terrorism efforts: US State Dept

There should be little problem in naming the sponsors of the existing narrative. They are the flag-bearers of the ‘national interest’, which, according to these flag-bearers, cannot be served without Pakistan continuing to be a national security state. In the past, this view bred terrorists and allowed organised manipulators to turn them into their foot-soldiers. A sizable proportion of the Pakistan population, for one reason or the other, has long supported the extremist and terrorist narrative. This happened because our paradigm as a national security state was glorified and terrorist organisations were considered instruments of this national security state.

The media, intelligentsia and political forces have only now begun to fear that the present national narrative is working against Pakistan and its people. Questions about the sponsors of this narrative are being asked more frequently ever since the launch of Operation Zarb-e-Azb. But these questions are not being asked as forcefully as they should be. While it is becoming a trend in the media and the academia to seek a national narrative that espouses peace, development and counterterrorism objectives, whether such a narrative can actually help the cause of peace remains to be seen.

Pakistan disrupted terror plots against US, says Obama

Those striving for an alternative narrative first need to identify the sponsors of the present narrative and their political motives, their gains and ultimate stakes in the national drift. The harbingers of this narrative can be categorised as ideological, political and financial beneficiaries. The biggest achievement of the present narrative has been in its neutralising of the forces that could do something to stop extremism from seeping into the power structure.

What we must remember is that the new counterterror narrative, among other things, should focus on helping reduce the present civil-military divide. Any counterterror narrative that targets the military as the sole entity that coined and indoctrinated the extremist narrative into national arteries would only help the cause of terrorists. At the same time, no counterterror narrative can be articulated without recognising the urgent need for restructuring the state of Pakistan on democratic lines. If the present narrative has injected life into those power centres that have disrupted national life, the alternative narrative should avoid reinforcing another set of disruptive stakeholders in the name of democracy. It should rather seek political strength for democratic forces through civil-military reconciliation and restructuring of the state on anti-disruptive lines. 

Published in The Express Tribune, February 10th,  2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.


shahid | 5 years ago | Reply Historical facts are very difficult to wipe out no matter how much one linguistic jargon is used to hide them. Thus for example, there never was a military invasion of Afghanistan by Russians. They simply came over to help the Afghans when they slaughtered the then existing ruler Hafeezullah who had taken power after slaughtering another Russian lae ckey Tarakai who had slaughtered Daud Khan and his whole family, all Russian implants in the first place. And theh they brought in Babrak Karmal with their tanks and put him on the pedestal. None of this happened. The people of Afghanistan absolutely had no right to resist the invasion of their countries and stand up for their freedom and independence. Quite a few - in millions - simply decided to leave their homes because Pakistan and America told them to and of course they jumped at the opportunity to live miserable lives in the refugee camps of Pakistan and Afghanistan for decades and quite a few of them still continue to do. Americans and Pakistani's brided them to do all of this and then paid hundreds of thousands of them to happily walk into Afghanistan to present themselves before the Russian bullets, bombs, missiles, How much history will you re-write? May God help you and your fellow travelers in this holy quest...
numbersnumbers | 5 years ago | Reply @Asmat: Notice that @Asmat somehow neglected to have the courage to name the WHO! Or is he just spouting delusions of denial since it just has to be a "foreign hand"! LOL!
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read