Why did Qadri kill Governor Taseer?

What the religious parties are getting wrong is the difference between the law itself and its abuse.


Editorial January 11, 2011
Why did Qadri kill Governor Taseer?

The anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Islamabad, on January 10, listened to a confessional statement of Mumtaz Qadri, the policeman who killed Governor Salmaan Taseer. He said he had acted "alone" and that he had planned the murder over three days before manoeuvring to get himself posted in the special police squad which protects the Punjab governor.

The killer also revealed that he was persuaded to carry out the murder after listening to the ‘rousing sermons’ delivered by Maulvi Hanif Qureshi and Ishtiaq Shah at a religious gathering, on December 31 near his residence in Rawalpindi. He said in his statement: “These sermons not only moved me to act against the man who spoke against the sanctity of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) but compelled me to stand up against those who were demanding changes in the blasphemy laws.”

Mr Qadri also exonerated “any political or religious group” of involvement in the governor’s assassination. Several religious groups have of late been protesting against what they claim is a conspiracy to change a law considered sacred. In this context, it is also claimed that the aim of this alleged conspiracy is to change the blasphemy law,  an act which will encourage people to commit acts of blasphemy against the Holy Prophet (pbuh). This, of course, is not true and nothing can substantiate such a serious allegation, which is made with much impunity by the clerics.

Following Taseer's murder, a debate has arisen with protagonists arguing that Qadri and the governor represented two extremes. This is where the Pakistani mind needs to be concentrated. It is entirely wrong and self-serving on the part of those who lean on extremism to say that ‘religious extremism’ and ‘liberal extremism’ are equally bad. Regrettably, the country has for some time regarded liberalism as a borrowed or imported value, serving the interest of ‘foreign powers’ hostile to Pakistan. The hidden message is: put an end to liberalism and you will see Pakistan moving away from ‘religious extremism’. Liberalism, alas, will always remain a minority reaction among those who fear some kind of endgame in ‘religious extremism’. Equating the two is not a wise thing to do because no one will ever say that Pakistan is threatened by ‘liberal extremism’ or that liberal extremist suicide bombers are roaming the streets killing innocent people. The religious speakers who affected the thinking of Governor Taseer’s killer say they are not to blame for what happened. According to their statements, they simply said that a blasphemer had to be dealt with in accordance with the law and that “Sherry Rehman should not bring an amendment bill to parliament but should take recourse to the court of law”. The statements betray a lack of knowledge of the country’s institutional working. But Mr Qadri could not have stood up to say that the courts in Pakistan adjudicate in accordance with the laws as framed or amended first by parliament.

What the religious parties are getting wrong is the difference between the law itself and its abuse. Any law, divine or human, can be abused and this can be set right not by removing the law but reformulating it in such a way through procedural readjustment that the aspects of its abuse are minimised. Was not the Hudood Law misused on a daily basis by the police which took money to book the accused under Hudood, rather than the normal law, to make the process more punishing? What Maulvi Hanif Qureshi and Ishtiaq Shah should have noted is that poor, illiterate and unprotected persons belonging to minority communities are often trapped under the blasphemy law. It takes long years for them to be exonerated by the higher courts and the wrongful accusers are never called to account. What happened to Mumtaz Qadri is happening to most of us falling under the influence of the campaign of misplaced outrage led by clerical parties. The court may not find them directly guilty of having plotted to kill Governor Taseer through him, but any rational person will agree that the atmosphere of extreme reaction deliberately created in the streets and mosques of Pakistan is responsible for Mr Qadri’s actions.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 12th, 2011.

COMMENTS (21)

Iqbal | 13 years ago | Reply I read an article recently about a salesman in Pakistan who went to a certain business and waited ages to be seen by the purchasing manager of the establishment and after waiting for quite a long time, he was impatient and entered the office of the manager and passed him his business card at which the manager threw the card in the bin. The salesman reported him to the mullahs, on the basis that beacuse his first name was Mohammed and written on the card there blasphemy was committed as he threw a card in the bin with the name Mohammed written on it. The mullahs convicted the manager! More recently in Multan, a 45 year old imam and his 20 year old son have been convicted of blasphemy and sentenced to life. Why? read on.... After numerous attempts to let a group of people know that they did not want any promotional posters on the wall, father and son ripped a poster off the wall which was advertising an upcoming event. The poster had a Koranic Verse on it so the pair were reported and convicted for bringing Islam into repute! Come OOOOOON guys..the world is laughing at us..and probably the Prohets/Angels in heaven are also..... Get a grip and study your Deen rather than taking the local preachers word for it!
Waiting | 13 years ago | Reply @ Aurangzeb Can you give us any examples?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ