Understanding our history: Experts discuss Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan

Seminar organised in celebration of Jinnah’s 139th birthday; his policies and views were examined


Our Correspondent December 20, 2015
Seminar organised in celebration of Jinnah’s 139th birthday; his policies and views were examined PHOTO: EXPRESS FILE

KARACHI: The misconception about Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan can only be sorted out if we read about him ourselves rather than grasping others’ opinions, said Prof Dr Tahir Masood, former chairperson of the department of mass communication at the University of Karachi.

A discussion on ‘Jinnah’s Vision For Minorities’ was organised by the Pakistan Development Forum (PDF) at Brain Gym, where guest speakers Dr Masood, international relations expert Shujaat Hussain and head of the editorial board at the Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Sardar Nazish were invited to shed light on Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s vision for the country in celebration of his 139th birthday.

Leghari and the making of ‘Jinnah’



Hussain shed light on Jinnah’s policy, lamenting  that we are still lost in a debate whether Pakistan was made to be a secular or theocratic state and that has made us ignorant towards the rights of our minorities.

“If we look at his personal staff, there were people from all the minorities, this fact can lead us to what Quaid-e-Azam actually wanted,” said Dr Masood in reply to a question about what Jinnah actually wanted in terms of minorities.

Jinnah’s letter to Pakistan: Who do I hold accountable?

“He never believed in ethnic or religious divides, his vision was above all this,” added Nazish. “His vision was the same for everyone and that made him a victorious man in the sub-continent,” he claimed.

Dr Masood responded to a question about the resolution to the current crisis and said that the only solution is to change our individual mindset, which will gradually bring change to society.

“Unfortunately, a leader like the Quaid-e-Azam was never born in this country. He was a man of principle and character but our people failed to find or elect a leader like him again. We are actually facing a crisis of leadership,” he explained. He added that nations require a vision but we have been living for the last 70 years without a true leader or vision.

Footprints in time: The lure of Jinnah’s legacy

Nazish said that if we bring tolerance in our individual lives, we can slowly improve and the complaints that our minority groups have will decrease. He was interrupted by Dr Masood who was concerned with the use of the word ‘minority’ as, according to him, “we are all one”.

“I will advise the youth that tolerance and truthfulness are the keys to achieving what Quaid-e-Azam wanted from the nation,” added Nazish.

Hussain said, “Youngsters should research about what secularism actually is and read your history as much as you can”.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 21st,  2015.

COMMENTS (6)

Bin Ismail | 9 years ago | Reply Rahul : Please note, and in Jinnah's own words instead of anybody else's, that his demand for Pakistan was neither in the name of Islam nor exclusively for the Muslims. Jinnah stated categorically:
“I am NOT fighting for Muslims, believe me, when I demand Pakistan.” [Jinnah, Press Conference, 14 November 1946]
Note, that he said these words merely months before Pakistan came into being. With the amount of disinformation around, anyone would naturally jump to ask that if Jinnah was not fighting for the Muslims in his demand for Pakistan, then who was he fighting for. The answer is: for the political rights of the "Muslim-majority states" of British India. The Muslim-majority provinces of British India, were as a "bloc", the smaller and more disadvantaged bloc of Indian states. In an undivided India, or at least without autonomy, this bloc of states would conveniently have been marginalized by the larger bloc of Hindu-majority provinces. Let's consider another example. In spite of the fact that the founding 13 states of the US were Christian-majority states, George Washington's struggle for the USA was not exactly a fight for Christians, let alone Christianity. Washington felt that these states would be politically subdued by Britain, and hence his demand for independence. As far as Jinnah's struggle for the political rights of the Indian Muslims in general is concerned, yes, he was indeed the spokesman for all Indian Muslims from Quetta to Chittagong, but this struggle was a much broader struggle and distinct from his struggle for Pakistan. Not once, did he appeal to all the Muslims of British India to migrate to the Muslim-majority provinces. If his demand for Pakistan had been in the name of Islam or exclusively for the Indian Muslims, he would have done so. The Muslims living in the Hindu-majority states who did move to Pakistan, were basically compelled by the hostile environment that developed around the time of Independence. The Muslim-majority provinces, both as "provinces" and also as a "group of provinces", were economically and politically lagging behind the others, and in an undivided India, this lag would surely have increased. Hence, Jinnah's demand for Pakistan.
Rahul | 9 years ago | Reply Jinnah asked for a state in the name of one religion. How can anybody claim that religion would not provide the guiding principles for that state?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ