Take a good look at the photo above. Noticeably absent are … you guessed it … women. Sure, there are a few in the room, but not one woman is seated at the table in a position of power — because not one of the above countries has a woman foreign minister. Such an abject lack of gender parity at high-stakes talks like these is shameful.
Saudi holds first ever election open to women
In a 2012 report on women’s participation in peace negotiations, UN Women observed that a “limited but reasonably representative sample of 31 major peace processes between 1992 and 2011 reveals that only four percent of signatories, 2.4 per cent of chief mediators, 3.7 percent of witnesses and 9 per cent of negotiators are women.”
The report adds that “the underrepresentation of women at the peace table is much more marked than in other public decision-making roles, where women are still underrepresented but where the gap has been steadily narrowing.
Women feature in a third of news, but rarely report it
This includes the roles that typically dominate peace talks: politician, lawyer, diplomat and member of a party to armed conflict. Women’s structural exclusion from peace talks has significant consequences for the extent to which issues of concern to them — such as violence against women or women’s citizenship rights — are addressed.”
Former Italian Foreign Minister and Chief EU Diplomat Federica Mogherini played a key role earlier this year in negotiating the historic nuclear deal with Iran. Afterwards, she talked about the value of having women playing a meaningful role in the talks.
Iran appoints first woman ambassador since revolution
“Having many women at the table in key positions helped us be concrete and pragmatic the whole way,” Mogherini said at the time.
This article originally appeared on The New York Times, a partner of The Express Tribune
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ