India only set to discuss Pakistan-controlled Kashmir: diplomat

High commissioner TCA Raghavan made the remarks about the disputed territory during a lecture in Islamabad


Afp December 14, 2015
T.C.A. Raghavan. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: India's representative to Pakistan said on Monday his country was only prepared to discuss the part of Kashmir controlled by Islamabad in upcoming peace talks, presenting a potential stumbling block days after the dialogue was announced.

High commissioner TCA Raghavan made the remarks about the disputed territory during a lecture in the capital, after a breakthrough visit by India's foreign minister Sushma Swaraj at which the resumption of ministerial talks was announced.

According to a joint statement, the two sides will talk about peace and security as well as territorial disputes including Kashmir. Each country occupies part of the territory but claims it in full.

‘Secret diplomacy’ on the cards for Kashmir

Asked where the room for negotiation lay over the Himalayan territory, Raghavan said it was India which first petitioned the United Nations to intervene when the-then princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was invaded by Pakistani forces in 1947.

"The first application was moved by India and it was on the grounds that a part of the state, which had acceded to India, is now under the illegal occupation.

Sushma Swaraj briefs Indian lawmakers on Pakistan visit

"So when you say what is it that India is going to discuss or what is it discussing, it is really, if you ask most Indians, and what is our position - it is the part of that state which is still under the control of Pakistan."

The remarks could create a diplomatic wrinkle for the two countries as they seek to go back to the negotiation table to undertake broad-spectrum talks for the first time since the election of prime ministers Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif.

Badar Alam, editor of Herald magazine, said: "I think it is a step back," adding that Kashmir was viewed internationally as a disputed territory.

Pakistan, India NSAs discuss LoC, Kashmir issue in Bangkok

He added that given the fragile state of the dialogue, officials on both sides needed to tread "very cautiously and very carefully" to avoid a backlash.

New Delhi suspended all talks after gunmen attacked Mumbai in November 2008, killing 166 people.

The countries agreed to resume the peace process in 2011 but tensions have spiked over the past two years, with cross-border shelling over the disputed border in Kashmir claiming dozens of lives since 2014.

A brief meeting between premier Nawaz and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on the sidelines of the UN climate change summit in Paris on November 30, followed by talks between the two countries' national security advisers in Bangkok, appeared to have broken the ice.

COMMENTS (47)

Someone | 8 years ago | Reply @Vectra, John B: You can come up with any fictional narrative you want, but it won't change the facts. The ground reality is that it is IoK that is disputed, not PoK and that has been the case for 67 years. Whenever the international media talks about Kashmir dispute, we all know it is about the Indian occupied Kashmir. Everyone knows that, including you. It is always the Indians who get the flak when the K word is mentioned - go figure. Regarding the Instrument of Accession, it was a null and void (illegal) document which has no basis. In fact, the original document is not even available. If we assume it was signed, India had no moral reason to occupy Kashmir since it was against the wishes of the Kashmiris, and not in accordance with the Radcliffe Line treaty where all provinces were to be divided according to their geography and Muslim populations. After 67 years, nothing has changed and the world doesn't recognise Jammu and Kashmir as a territory of India - how about begin with that. India's stance doesn't matter since we have the international point of view, and anyway, Pakistan never has and never will recognise Kashmir with India. After a century, Indian occupied Kashmir will most likely be jointly administered between Pakistan and India, where India will probably deal with the state constitutionally whereas Pakistan will be responsible for IoK's defence, foreign relations, administration etc. Indian occupied Kashmir is a mess whereas Azad Kashmir is peaceful and developing. No UN resolution or international instrument legally refers to Kashmir as part of India. Just because you Indians keep your head under the sand and deny that doesn't change the ground realities.
Vectra | 8 years ago | Reply @Bewildered: "Your rebuttal is not only funny, but an outright insult to the intellects of every rational and knowledgeable person on this planet." Thats your take not mine.I have stated only facts,cheers.Btw Insult??? How?? Explain
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ