Etihad Airways denies buying PIA

Employee unions, backed by thousands of workers and opposition political parties, are up in arm against privatisation


Our Correspondent December 12, 2015
PHOTO: REUTERS

KARACHI:


Etihad Airways has denied reports of purchasing Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), which the government has put up for privatisation in the coming months.


“The reports have no substance and are totally unfounded,” it said in a statement issued through its local PR agent. No one was immediately available to explain why the airline felt the need to clarify its position.

PIA and Etihad Airways sign codeshare agreement

The government wants to sell 26% stake along with management control in PIA, which has been saddled with billions of rupees in debt and other legacy costs.

PIA management has been inducted new aircraft lately in a bid to bring down fixed costs and increase frequency but it will take much more for its finances to improve, officials say. Employee unions, backed by thousands of workers and opposition political parties, are up in arm against privatisation.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 12th, 2015.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (6)

wasim ahmed | 8 years ago | Reply I stop flying with PIA after bad experience couple of times . I prefer Qatar or gulf airlines. PIA is just tax payer eating machine.. Its a kind of charity that people of Pakistan are giving to PIA employees to enjoy luxury life, and in return they get bad service.... still they don't want govt to privatize it... Strange people with strange thinking patterns... Another option is to register PIA employees under BISP program, which is same as getting money for doing nothing..
Rizwan Khan | 8 years ago | Reply These free loaders and free tickets for friends and family has lead to this. I've no sympathy with them
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ