According to a statement by the PTI chief's spokesperson, Imran asserted the leadership had to take bold initiatives and convince their people to move forward with dignity and confidence.
Imran Khan comes out strong with conviction as he questions secret "deniable" mtgs of Nawaz with Modi. https://t.co/YgunCdy9v1
— Shireen Mazari (@ShireenMazari1) December 2, 2015
1. Shocked by revelation that PM Sharif had held a secret “deniable” mtg with his Indian counterpart PM Modi in 2014 in Kathmandu.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
4.It is ldrs who must take bold initiatives & convince their ppl to move forward with dignity & confidence.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
“Unfortunately, the present leadership of Pakistan and India lacks the courage and the conviction, which has led them to hold secret meetings that can be denied,” he said.
5.Present ldrs of Pak & India lack courage & conviction, which has led them to hold secret meetings that can be denied.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
Nawaz, Modi had hour-long ‘secret’ meeting in Kathmandu: book
Imran said while Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was a prisoner of his extremist right wing supporters, PM Nawaz conveyed a deep-rooted fearfulness of the military establishment.
6. While PM Modi is a prisoner of his extremist right wing supporters, PM Sharif conveys a deep-rooted fearfulness of the Establishment.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
"This inability to move forward confidently by Nawaz is also undermining the credibility of the Pakistan's armed forces at a critical juncture in our history when the military is combating terrorism across the country," the statement added.
The PTI chief said he believed peace between Pakistan and India was critical for the prosperity of the people of the subcontinent, as it will ensure economic vibrancy through trade and investment opportunities.
"Peace requires conflict resolution and de-escalation of military tensions along the border, the Line of Control (LoC) and the Working Boundary," he added.
3. But peace requires conflict resolution & de-escalation of military tensions along the border, LOC & Working Boundary.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
Imran said the secret meeting in Kathmandu was made possible by an Indian steel magnate.
Given the Sharifs' steel business interests, the PTI chairman said, PM Nawaz clearly has a conflict of interest between his and the country's national interests.
8. Also concerned that mtg in Nepal enabled by Indian steel magnate. With Sharifs steel business interests, a conflict of interest arises.
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
Fence mending: Ice melts as Nawaz, Modi shake hands
Imran reminded how Nawaz was the first Pakistani premier who, while visiting New Delhi for Modi’s inauguration as PM, failed to find time to meet the Kashmiri delegation – because of his meetings with Indian business magnates.
The PTI supremo asserted leaders lead and initiate policies, especially when political breakthroughs are required.
"Leaders are expected to convince their nations of their initiatives, not hide and have “deniable” secret meetings through their business interests. Unfortunately, PM Nawaz seems unable to take any policy initiative or even a position of clarity on India publicly."
13.If PM is convinced of rightness of his cause then he should not fear the ppl but lead by convincing public of his position on India
— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) December 2, 2015
SAARC summit salvaged after handshake by Nawaz, Modi
Paris meeting
Meanwhile, PTI leader also questioned the most recent interaction in Paris between Nawaz and Modi, which, he said, also raised serious questions, as there has been a complete silence over what transpired in that tête-à-tête.
"At a time when mistrust and hostility between the two neighbours is at its peak, Nawaz as prime minister should inform the nation of what was exchanged in that conversation," the statement said.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ