Judiciary not the only guardian of rule of law, must be guarded from its excess by parliamentary and public opinion.

Add dimension of selflessness to the resolution and watch it succeed or make it narrow, selfish and mark its failure.

The executive's attempt to interfere in the appointment of judges is a bid to achieve its own ends.

Rule of Law, if it were to be implemented in earnest, would limit the powers of each of the three state actors.

The public is likely to demand a delicate balance between activism and restraint by the judiciary.

If we know and are proud of who we are, we need not be afraid of becoming someone else or Indian dominance.

It appears to protect selfish interests of its self-styled leaders, who have decided to manipulate, hoodwink people.

Absence of topic exploring bench & bar relationship suggests judiciary either takes it for granted or ignores it.

Fakhra’s death is a reminder of the insufficiency of our efforts, she and others are casualties of an unequal fight.

I am dismayed by the barometer with which the Supreme Court appears to gauge the seriousness of events.