Who will end the anti-Muslim discrimination: The White House or the “Right” House?

We are against drone strikes and force feeding of inmates at Guantanamo Bay but what about Shia and Ahmadi killing?

Faheem Younus July 27, 2013
This is the story of two Washington Iftar dinners.

First, the Israeli Ambassador, Michael Oren, invited Muslim leaders to a diplomatic Iftar dinner last week and Imam Antepli of Duke University wondered aloud if the event was meaningful. Then the Obama administration invited Muslim leaders to the White House Iftar dinner and Omid Saifi, the Islamic studies professor from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, called to boycott it.

It’s obvious that we, the American Muslims, are struggling to identify the right posture: Boycott, and you sever a diplomatic tie; attend, and you are seen as the “enemy’s” ally.

While I empathise with the demands laid out by Professor Saifi - the Obama administration should abandon overseas drone attacks, halt nationwide racial and religious profiling, and release select Guantanamo Bay prisoners - I knew the boycott will fail to achieve anything beyond creating a social media ripple - because that’s the history of our boycotts.

A Danish newspaper published offensive cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and what was the response? Boycott Danish products. Iran’s largest mobile phone company, Irancell, sent a religiously offensive text message and what was the response? Boycott Irancell. Israeli dates were sold at American Muslim stores during this Ramazan and what was the response? You guessed it. (Yet Muslims consume Danish cookies, Irancell is still in business and the “Jewish dates” - if there is such a thing - are selling like hot cakes at my local ethnic store.)

Internal Muslim discord is part of the reason these boycotts fizzle out. We all know the sectarian rifts that lurk beneath the diplomatic smiles. No surprise, both Muslim Congressmen and over four dozen diplomats attended the event on July 25th.


But our misplaced reliance is the larger reason; we are barking up the wrong tree. Want to change anti-Muslim discrimination? Then also go to the “right” house, not just the White House. The ‘right’ house of God who warned us in the Holy Quran, that Allah (SWT) does not change the condition of people until they change the condition of their hearts.

Just like Professor Saifi, the Quran also made a “call to conscience”. But who wants to hear about that? Boycotts are glitzy; introspection is dull; it makes us get out of our comfort zone and ask hard questions.

Yes, drone attacks are immoral and should be stopped but where is the call for the boycott of the Saudi sponsored madrassahs fuelling terror attacks that have claimed over tenfold Muslim lives as compared to the drones?

Yes, we should stand up against the forced-feeding of some Guantanamo Bay prisoners but let’s also stand up for the well documented and sustained extrajudicial killings of prisoners in Pakistan.

Yes, the pockets of racial and religious profiling by the US authorities should be protested but who is going to wail against the institutionalised racial and religious oppression (and in some cases, killings) of the Shias in Pakistan, Ahmadis in Indonesia, Bahai’s in Iran and Copts in Egypt?

Demanding the same rights in the US, which we so blatantly trample upon in the Muslim countries takes away the strength of our moral arguments. It equates us with the very mindset we resent. It enables the White House to fill up the sought after Iftar dinner to its brink despite our calls for a boycott.

For us Muslims, Ramazan is a time for reflection and prayer. Let’s reflect upon the teachings of the Holy Prophet (pbuh), introspect and be charitable to those who are discriminated against in our own backyards - both Muslims and non-Muslims and spend the remaining fasts in heart melting prayers.

Even if the White House ignores our demands, the ‘right’ house might accept them.

This piece was originally published here.
Faheem Younus The writer is clinical associate professor at University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA. The author can be followed @Faheem http://twitter.com/#!/FaheemYounus
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.


gp65 | 8 years ago | Reply @Eddied: Sorry. I clearly misread the intent of your post. Apologies.
Truthbetold | 8 years ago | Reply "While I empathise with the demands laid out by Professor Saifi – the Obama administration should abandon overseas drone attacks, halt nationwide racial and religious profiling, and release select Guantanamo Bay prisoners" The best, surest and fastest way to end drone strikes is to end the state support for terrorists by the Pak Establishment. Why did drone strikes and Guantanamo prison camp came into existence in the first place?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ