Kalabagh dam: PML-N's solution to our energy crisis?

With $7 billion spent on import of fuel for power, Kalabagh can actually help Pakistan get out of its circular debt.

Sara Shujat May 29, 2013
Pakistan, after the elections, is once again faced with perhaps the most divisive political issue- the construction of the Kalabagh dam. One of the many expectations from the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is to bring to life the Kalabagh dam; a subject that has been brushed under the carpet for a long period of time.

So, the questions arise, will Mr Nawaz Sharif be able to address this issue through consensus among the provinces? And, will we as Pakistani citizens for once rise above our internal conflicts and work towards our collective development?

It cannot be ruled out that the Kalabagh dam issue is ridden with conflicts, with the province of Sindh at the forefront of the opposition and Balochistan also spelling out its reluctance. The reason behind this resistance has been clearly highlighted by Sindhi and Balochis. They fear that with the construction of the dam, Punjab will unlawfully divert the water to irrigate their own land, leaving the other lands arid.

Their stance is quite clear; they want the site of the Kalabagh dam to be shifted away from Mianwali. I am not denying nor challenging their demands. My contention is that if a nation is within the grip of unprecedented and acute electricity shortages which does not only hamper economic development but also takes its toll on the people’s daily lives, the construction of the dam should be made a priority.

Agricultural sub-committee of the Multan Chamber of Commerce and Industry is also emphasising the need to undertake Kalabagh construction work. It is believed that only through Kalabagh, the country will be in a position to safeguard its agricultural based economy which is adding 26% to the GDP, and livelihood of 52% of the total population is dependent upon it.

Moreover, many in Pakistan are supportive of the Kalabagh project, as this dam will help to utilise surplus water of the river Indus. It also happens to be one of the most investigated projects in the world. It has not only gained financial support from the World Bank but also from many international agencies.

Yet, this does not allow the construction of the dam to escape criticism from people who hold to the view that this dam will displace a large number of people and inundate fertile lands in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab. Their apprehension stems from the fact that many acres of land could be lost due to water logging in Mardan, Swabi and Charssada.

One of the fears is that if Kalabagh is implemented, there will be no water available for downstream Kotri in the future leading to a chaos in the delta and the katcha areas of Sindh. The sea intrusion caused by this dam is also predicted to cause heavy financial losses to the Sindh economy. These fears are relevant but it is also important to remind us that Pakistan spends $7 billion yearly on import of fuel for operating thermal power units- let’s say if Kalabagh is built, the country will be absolved of this burden that has strangled the country’s economy.

Kalabagh could actually help Pakistan get out of its circular debt.

Some argue that Diamer Basha is of more relevance for Pakistan, even though I do not completely disapprove their stance, I still believe that Kalabagh is far more superior to Diamer Basha. Kalabagh being located in Mianwali District, is easily accessible and close to the network of power transmission that is certainly not the case with Basha located 197 miles upstream of Tarbela which is quite difficult to access.

The mean annual river flows at Kalabagh is much higher approximately 90 million acre feet (MAF) compared to around 50.53 MAF mean annual river flow at Basha.

One of the main reasons why Kalabagh should be given priority is because it is almost ready for construction and if proper work is undertaken this projected can be completed in six years meanwhile Diamer Basha’s construction period may exceed ten years due to difficulty in accessing the location.

The crucial factor that points in favour of Kalabagh is the low cost that this project entails. Cost wise, Diamer Basha is substantially more expensive than Kalabagh.

It is true that both Kalabagh and Diamer Basha are indispensable for meeting for accelerating electricity and water requirements  in Pakistan but Basha certainly fails to be an alternative for Kalabagh as it is only the latter that can provide hydropower and irrigation water that is required in the coming years.

It is vital for the government of Pakistan, PML-N, to start taking the long awaited steps needed to lead Kalabagh Project to its completion. Although, nothing has been done in the last few years to build the consensus of the provinces over the Kalabagh dam, let us hope that PML-N in 2013 puts it act together to get this consensus.

It has been proposed that a “Dispute Resolution Commission” consisting of politicians, engineers and people who are actively involved in keeping the Kalabagh issue alive should be set up.

The aim should be to propagate with facts and figures among the people of Sindh that they will be the maximum gainers if Kalabagh Dam is built and will be its worst victims if it is not built.

It is crucial for Pakistan to determine and sort out the real causes of opposition to the building of the Kalabagh Dam and take concrete steps to address them. Perhaps, it is mandatory to discuss this issue more openly through talk shows and debates on the media and at other forums.
WRITTEN BY:
Sara Shujat A lawyer, researcher and human rights advocate, currently working in a think-tank based in Pakistan. She enjoys reading and writing and wants to publish a book before she hits thirties. She is in to swimming, playing instruments, art and aspires to join theatre in future. She loves travelling!
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (59)

Sami | 7 years ago | Reply @Ahsanullah Mehsud: Brother I like your logical comments that it is agreed for two rivers on KPK Side and one on Punjab but issue is 1) lack of irrigation structure and please don't bash Punjab Punjab has'nt tied KPK politician last 30 years not to make their irrigation system. There seriousness can be seen they didnt made any feasibility yet 2) Southern KPK don't get benefit from the Basha. I not saying myself its word of one most educated and twice chairman of WAPDA Shamul-Malik and please dont say Shamul-malik is punjabi blood he is pure Puktoon but one with logical and highly educated. Reason, Two river system cannot be used by KPK is because irrigation system can not be develop on the lower basin of the indus river in KPK side because height at that level is 100 to 150 feet above. Now as per KPK politicians Water coming in Kalabagh will rise and Nowshera will be Sink into water if that logic is true then all of the southern KPK can get water in normal day no height issue be problem for irrigation. But the ANP and other logic fail over here. Till the time KPK does not make or provide alternative route for irrigation for the water it cannot use the water and as Per Irsa any unused water will be divided among other provinces and that how Punjab is getting water but don't forget Sindh and Balochistan also they get the share too. Why Kalabagh is good for KPK ? 1) you can claim the water of the two rivers as per accord because water into the left canal will irrigate the southern KPK and southern KPK Irrigation will be develop because of the left Canal. 2) there is 8,00,000 Acres of Land not getting cultivated becasue of no water in southern KPK that can used to grow field and provide more food security to KPK and the country. 3)Bringing business and Jobs in southern KPK mean more prosperity. Hope it answer your question.
Ali | 7 years ago | Reply Antwerpen: An EU Based International mediator Mohammad Faisal revealed in his interview that triangular USA, India and Israel are against the building of Kala Bagh Dam. They had signed an agreement during March 2001 that no big Dam should be built in Pakistan, so that the economy of Pakistan may not be improved. Certain Pakistani Politicians are included in this conspiracy and they had been heavily compensated for this act. Sindh nationalist leaders, Khyber Pakhtunkhwah leaders are getting financial benefits from this treason. Talking with UNN correspondent Barber Azad he said the current situation, if the Sindh-Tas agreement is strictly complied with and if this process is rigorously monitored, it will be impossible for India to block Pakistan`s share of water. The international guarantor of this agreement, which was signed in the 1980s in order to give a legal form to the use of river waters by Pakistan and India, was also chosen at that time. The World Bank was its guarantor. Pakistan has been complying with this agreement since the very first day, but India had not been able to abide by the terms of this agreement. During 2008 when Pakistan government has refused to build the Kalabagh Dam India started building Kargil Dam, because if Pakistan does not build any dam then India will be open to do so and they are building Kargil dam buglihar dam and hundreds of other small dams. Kargil Dam is the 2nd largest dam in the world. By changing the name of Khyber Pukhtoonkhwah, Government has laid down first brick for the freedom of frontier. These are the words of Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan Peshawar. Mohammad Faisal also declared that Asfand yar Wali has said that if Kala Bagh Dam is built he will announce the independent Pukhtoon Khwah. Now, decision is in the hands of public, whether they accept or reject these Kind of Politicians who support US agenda
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ