Pakistani girls attend class at a school in Mingora. PHOTO: AFP

Will Pakistan’s education reforms ever move beyond what students wear?

Policing what school-children, particularly girls, wear has an iron-like grasp on the minds of Pakistan’s policymakers

Muhammad Atif February 04, 2022

Pakistan’s education system is riddled with a myriad of issues, with poor infrastructure, the questionable quality of the information being imparted, the formatting of the syllabus, and ensuring that girls in the country have equal access to schooling being some of the primary concerns plaguing the system. It has long been evident that Pakistan’s public school system in particular is in desperate need of greater regulation in order to ensure that a quality standard is being met across the nation. This is imperative if we truly wish to provide all children with a level playing field and equal opportunities in their future prospects. Yet, despite these pressing concerns, it comes across as no surprise that the state is instead more fixated on mandating facile and cosmetic changes in Pakistan’s schools in an attempt to ensure that religion remains a cornerstone of the school system.

The latest manifestation of this fixation appeared to come on January 18, 2022, when Punjab Education Minister Murad Raas reportedly ordered that all boys in government schools in Punjab must wear caps and the girls must wear a dupatta or scarf. However, the Focal Person to Chief Minister Punjab on Digital Media Azhar Mashwani later clarified that this was not true. Instead, Mashwani stated that the reading of the Quran had been made mandatory for all Muslim children in primary schools in Punjab, and the wearing of a cap or scarf would be compulsory only during this period in accordance with the Punjab Compulsory Teaching of Holy Quran Act, 2021. Yet, this clarification appears to give rise to more questions than answers.

For instance, surely even during the Quran lessons in school children should be given the choice as to whether or not they want to wear a cap or scarf. What exactly is being gained by enforcing all Muslim children to adhere to these newly established rules? The government once again seems preoccupied with menial changes which have little to no bearing on the quality of education being received by Pakistan’s school-going children. The state regularly fails to realise that since most parents in the country cannot afford a private education for their off-springs they have no choice but to adhere to the rules and regulations being implemented by the public school system – even if they disagree with them.

Additionally, if imparting a religious education is of such importance, this begs the question as to what provisions have been made for non-Muslim children during these Quran lessons in public schools. Will Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Parsi etc. children be taught from their respective holy texts? Or is the perceived importance of this activity only limited to Muslim students? Such measures will only compound problems stemming from the fact that for years Pakistan’s national curriculum has failed to account for its non-Muslim students, which in turn has led to great difficulties for their parents.

The fascination with policing what school-children, particularly girls, wear appears to have an iron-like grasp on the minds of Pakistan’s policymakers. In 2019, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government was hastily forced to withdraw an order which had instructed girls to ‘cover up’ by wearing an abaya or chadar. Perplexingly, the rationale used to justify the initial order was that the enforcement of this dress code would help reduce cases of harassment among school-girls. Unfortunately, such dangerously flawed logic which drives much of the decision-making in the country, and has great ramifications for Pakistan’s students, continues to remain pervasive.

The fact also remains that Pakistan’s education authorities are not only overly interested in what school-children wear but are also deeply concerned about what their teachers are wearing. In 2021, the The Federal Directorate of Education (FDE) in Islamabad banned female teachers from wearing jeans and tights at school. They were instead instructed to “wear appropriate, simple and decent” shalwar-kameez. How one determines the ‘decency’ of any given shalwar-kameez is perhaps a question that only the FDE can answer.

The gravity of the education crisis Pakistan is facing is no mere matter, and its severity seems to have only been exacerbated by the pandemic. In K-P, where Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has been in power for almost nine years, an estimated 1.8 million children are not in school, while other estimates state this number could be as high as 4.7 million. It is also no surprise that the majority of these 1.8 million children are girls. A Malala Fund report also found that “16% schools in K-P are without electricity, 12% have no clean drinking water facility, 5% are without boundary walls, and 4% do not have toilets.” Yet, despite all these shortcomings, the ruling party is instead spending its time and energy on implementing pointless dress codes – hence letting us know where its true priorities lie.

WRITTEN BY:
Muhammad Atif The writer is currently working for an NGO in Balochistan.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (1)

Ayesha Masood | 2 years ago | Reply When you have to bow down to manmade dress codes based on elitism it never irks you but one upholding the Divine guidelines for the Islamic dress code is something that gets under your skin. Sind Club is the cat s whiskers isn t it. Adults are willing to abide by a dress code. Men women who don t mind being dictated to in a place of pleasure find it difficult to come to terms with their kids being disciplined and protected by the enforcement of Allah s proposed dress code in a place of learning. An utter shame and double standards to say the least... http lahoregymkhana.org.pk index6e0d.html page id 3646 https www.sindclub.org.pk rulesForGuests.html Definition of Dress Type Formal Gentlemen should normally dress in a dinner jacket with a bow-tie fully button fronted collared shirt tucked in to tailored trousers and formal shoes with or without laces with dark coloured socks. Gentlemen may replace the dinner jacket and bow-tie requirement with a dark coloured suit with a tie keeping the rest of the attire the same or they may wear the National dress with an Achkan or Sherwani but not a Waistcoat. Ladies should dress with the appropriate formality. Lounge Suit also referred to as Informal Gentlemen should dress in a dark coloured suit with a tie fully button fronted collared shirt tucked in to suit trousers and evening shoes with or without laces with dark coloured socks. Gentlemen may wear the National dress with a dark coloured Waistcoat. Ladies should dress with the appropriate formality. Smart Casual Gentlemen should dress in a full sleeved collared shirt tucked in to tailored trousers made of any material other than denim and leather and shoes with or without laces other than joggers exercise shoes or work boots. Gentlemen may wear the National dress but with a Waistcoat unless specified otherwise. Gentlemen may also wear a full sleeved Turtle-neck top provided it is worn tucked in to trousers. Ladies should dress with the appropriate formality. Casual Gentlemen and ladies may dress in trousers or jeans made of any material worn with a short sleeved long sleeved or Chinese collared shirt Polo shirt Sports shirt Bush shirt or Turtle-neck top. All tops may be worn outside trousers. Gentlemen may wear the National dress without a Waistcoat. Shoes may be of leather or fabric with or without laces but sandals must be worn with back straps. Active Wear Gentlemen and ladies may wear shorts track suits gym athletic or sports attire including Tee shirts with round collars joggers trainers slippers and flip-flops.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ