Why is Pakistan the only country that does not recognise Armenia?
Pakistan is the only country in the world that doesn’t recognise the independence of Armenia. The South Caucasus country objectively exists and is a member of the UN, but Islamabad’s stance is a principled one practiced as a form of protest in response to Yerevan’s egregious human rights violations against the Azeris of Azerbaijan’s Nagorno-Karabakh region. There are some very good reasons why Pakistan doesn’t recognise Armenia, and they’ll be touched upon briefly in this piece.
The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is at the core of Pakistan’s decision. This war lasted from 1988-1994 and remains frozen to this day. The Armenians of Azerbaijan’s then-Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (region) wanted to unite with their ethnic brethren in nearby Armenia in the twilight days of the USSR. This was a direct consequence of the widespread explosion of pent-up nationalist sentiment in the Soviet Union triggered by Gorbachev’s failed experiment with glasnost (“openness”).
The Armenian-Azeri conflict long precedes that period, however, but was kept under control by the Soviet authorities until the central government began to crumble in the late 1980s. Stalin placed the majority-Armenian region of Nagorno-Karabakh under Azerbaijan’s administrative control as part of his nationality policy that critics claim was implemented as a form of divide and rule. This was never a serious issue until the dissolution of the USSR seemed possible and its many minorities began worrying about their future.
The Armenian Armed Forces invaded Azerbaijan to support the local Armenians’ secessionist attempt. They won the war and the region has remained de-facto independent since then, but practically all of its Azeri residents were ethnically cleansed as a result. Interestingly, not even Armenia itself recognises the self-proclaimed independence of Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding occupied regions that the local Armenians call “Artsakh”, though this is probably a political calculation since they’d be universally condemned if they did.
Four UNSC Resolutions (822, 853, 874, 884) were passed in 1993, all of which included calls for Armenia’s withdrawal from internationally recognised Azerbaijani territory. Suffice to say, Yerevan has refused to implement them. It did, however, express interest in the Madrid Principles that the OSCE’s Minsk Group proposed in 2007 and updated in 2009. Nevertheless, Armenia has claimed that its interpretation of these clauses differs from Azerbaijan’s and has thus indefinitely stalled any real implementation of these proposals.
The latest clashes along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border have returned global attention to this unresolved conflict. The author wrote about this recent outbreak of violence in his analyses titled “Don’t Fall For The Alt-Media Narrative On Armenia & Azerbaijan” and “Armenia, Azerbaijan Must Immediately Implement The Madrid Principles”, which should be skimmed by the reader if they’re interested in his interpretation of the contemporary geopolitical context in which this conflict is once again heating up.
To summarise, while Pakistan’s excellent relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey obviously played a role in its decision not to recognise Armenia, there was actually a lot more to it than just that. Pakistan doesn’t support the unilateral changing of international borders by force, nor does it agree with Armenia’s continued occupation of Azerbaijan. In addition, Pakistan is against Armenia’s refusal to implement UNSC Resolutions on Nagorno-Karabakh and strongly condemns its ethnic cleansing of local Azeris there.
Few are aware of Pakistan’s principled position towards this conflict, but it would greatly improve its soft power appeal within the international Muslim community (“Ummah”) if Islamabad raised greater awareness of its stance among fellow Muslim countries. The frozen Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is one of Eurasia’s geopolitical time bombs just like Kashmir and Palestine are, so Pakistan should make its position on the unresolved South Caucasus conflict just as well known as its approach towards the South Asian and Mideast ones already are.
COMMENTS (19)
armenia should give back azerbaijan lands for sake of Peace following ordinal arthodox traditions and jesus Peace be upon him teaching.dont listen war mongers Advices who wants battleground and killing innocents lives both sides.given land to azarbihan will make peace in region and prosperity for both sides and new friends.
Nagorno-karabakh has always been occupied by Armenians. It is not Azerbaijani soil, but it’s own independent republic.
IT SURPRISED ME, BUT WE SHOULD NOT FOLLOW OTHER IF THEY RECOGNISE OR NOT. WE ARE ON THE RIGHT PLACE THAT WE DONT TOLERATE THOSE WHO VIOLATES RIGHTS . WE ARE RIGHT AND THATS ENOUGH TO TELL ALLAH ON THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT THAT WE WERE AGAINST CRUALS. PAKISTAN ZINDABAD !!!
Do Pakistanis know where Armenia is?
Wait! Azerbaijan and Turkey recognize Armenia, but Pakistan doesn't? BTW, Azerbaijan supports Pakistan on Kashmir but recognizes India. You only make a fool of yourself by being the ONLY country in the world to not recognize a UN member.
This article fails to mention the Azeri anti-Armenian progoms and massacres in Baku, Sumgait and Kirovabad resulting in ethnic cleansing of all Armenians from Azerbaijan. This propaganda piece also fails to inform its readers that Azerbaijan started the conflict with Nagorno Karabagh and lost. Armenian forces didn't "invade" Azerbaijan. The liberated territory that was originally part of Armenia and protected their kinsmen from the genocidal policy of the Azerbaijan government. With all of its oil and gas money, Azerbaijan will never achieve any moral high ground and for that matter, neither will Pakistan. Armenia doesn't need Pakistan's recognition.
Pakistanis have uncanny talent to insert themselves into conflicts that are none of their business and get burnt in the process. That is why India and Israel are punishing Pakistan. And now Armenia may also join hands. No Muslim Ummah can even raise eyebrows at Armenia. All Civilized Democratic countries are with Armenia. You have been warned.
When religion islam was at its start everyone said No one will be accompany you but whole world saw that that poor Muslims rule world for more than centuries No matter who came against us Allah is with us
The article successfully ignored Armenian Genocide just like how often Bangla Genocide is ignored in this part of world.
If changing borders with force is the reason for failure to recognize - how about not recognizing Russia or China who are egregious abusers?
As Mark said this is bizarre and hilarious. This piece would have been more suited as sarcasm on incompetence of our bureaucracy, which apparently forgot to address this issue.If Turkey and Azerbaijan don't have a problem why should we.
.... and do you really think Armenia cares about the terrorist producer state of Pakistan doesn’t recognized its independence? Instead, Armenia is developing its military and economy cooperation with India since its independence. Perhaps that makes Pakistan to realize Armenia can practice its own unique way to respond Pakistan’s anti-Armenian policies.
Were did the Author do his research for this article? At a min one would expect journalists to work from historical facts and not made up opinions that are "influences by the Azer's and Turks". The Turks and Azeri have alot of hired pen's that are writing alot of nonsense. Bottom line, Pakistan is greatly influenced by the Turkish government. They do not recognize Armenia as a favor to the Turks. Lets see the history of Pakistan: "Pakistan gained independence in 1947 as a homeland for Indian Muslims following the Pakistan Movement, which sought statehood for the Muslim-majority regions of British India through partition." Their independence comes from establishing a homeland for Indian Muslims provided to them by the British. They were given a country, were lands were taken away from India proper. Karabagh which is Artsakh. If you walk around this area, you will find Armenian churches and Armenian graveyards, since before Pakistan people even existed. In 1923 Joseph Stalin, GAVE Artsakh to the Azeri to appease Mustafa Kamel (Turkish leader). It was given as an Oblast territory with the right to succeed at any time. The population of this area was 94% Armenians. This is well documented, regardless of any made ups stories that the Azeris say. Look at the Soviet History. In 1988, The Artsakh people voted to succeed and become independent. It was their soviet right to do so. The population at this time was 77% Armenian. The Azeri's had 50 years to remove the Armenians, they realized that it can't be done. Armenians have been living in Artsakh for thousands of years. Ask the Iranians, who lost many of battles trying to covert the Armenians of Artsakh to Islam. In the end, they respected their will to live and left them alone. The Azeri's did not like the vote, so they started to attack Armenian's living in Baku and then attacked Artsakh. Bottom line, The Turks and Azeri's would want nothing more to have Armenia disappear, but what they don't realize is that Armenians were on this land before the word Ottoman was even known. Pakistan - Sides with the Turks, and does not recognize Armenia because of this. It has nothing to do with what the Writer claims.
This is quite possibly the worst take you could have on this topic. A country using religious bias to base its decision making in international politics is about as unreasonable as believing human rights violations during war are one sided. Does the author realize what had to happen for war to ensue in that region during the late 80s, early 90s? The amount of pogroms in Azerbaijan where Armenians were targeted and killed, women and children, is Pakistan on board with these human rights violations? How could a country so adamant on controlling a region that densely population with Armenians ensure they wouldn't be subject to the same treatment? There are witness accounts of Azerbaijani law enforcement allowing those pogroms to take place, do you honestly believe it would be any different in NK? As a journalist i would imagine you would have the journalistic integrity to use research and reason to give a qualified opinion on topics as sensitive as these.
The fact that Pakistan is the only country in the world not recognizing Armenia's statehood is perhaps one of the most bizarre occurences in 21st century international politics, and the fact that Andrew Korybko finds justification in there is pure madness. Azerbaijan and Turkey recognize Armenia (irrespective of the Karabagh dispute) and Pakistan - which has no direct relation to Armenia or the conflict itself - decides not to?! Pakistan recognizes India - its perceived arch-foe - but not Armenia? Bizarre and ridiculous. In fact, by this logic, Pakistan may as well not recognize a few dozen other countries. Maybe Greece? Perhaps Cyprus? How about Russia, or the US (who at times had and still have tensions with Turkey and Pakistan respectively). Should Pakistan NOT recognize all non-Muslim states engaged in territorial disputes with Muslim states? I could surely find some. I understand Pakistan has some affinity towards their Islamic "brothers" west of the Caspian, but opting for a complete irrational, inconsequential political stance does not earn Pakistan the respect of a judicious player in world politics. Should all countries friendly to India not recognize Pakistan? Should Pakistan ask Turkey to not recognize India? (Of course, Turkey will never do that, and why should they?) Three things Pakistan's stance towards Armenia's statehood does: 1. Demonstrates a serious gap for Pakistan in grasping realities of contemporary international politics 2. Through its disproportional attitude, automatically subordinates Pakistan in its relationship to Turkey and Azerbaijan (both of whom recognize Armenia) 3. Equivocates its will to see no Armenia on the map to the genocidal politics of Ottoman Turks at the dawn of the 20th century (which Turkey tries so hard to erase from its history)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ