Why Pakistan must build the Shri Krishna Mandir in Islamabad
The recent fiasco surrounding the construction of Shri Krishna Mandir in Islamabad has once again highlighted the fault lines that have hamstrung Pakistan for decades. What was expected to be a symbol of religious tolerance and pluralism, has quickly turned into an ugly display of bigotry and narrow-mindedness. The current government, in its first two years in the office, had demonstrated an inclination to right the historical wrongs committed against Pakistan’s religious minorities.
Specifically, the opening of the Kartarpur corridor, restoration of Hindu temples in Pakistan, and the government’s decision to crackdown on fundamentalist protests in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Asia Bibi case verdict suggested that there is an honest desire to gradually but decisively reorient Pakistan. For the time being however, it seems that the government’s handling of the Krishna Mandir quandary will be central to determining the success of its pro-minority agenda.
First and foremost it is important to understand and highlight the unique nature of the relationship between Pakistan and its Hindu citizens. The Hindus of Pakistan are peerless in their loyalty to their homeland. Over seventy years ago, their forefathers made a conscious decision to stay in the newly-founded country, when hundreds of thousands were migrating to Hindu majority India. These were the people whose reverence for the land where their forefathers had lived and died trumped any fears of persecution. Even today, Pakistan’s Hindu citizens do not define their allegiance to the country through religion, but purely through their unconditional love for the land that countless generations have called home.
More importantly, it is not just the Hindu community of Islamabad but in fact the entire state of Pakistan that will benefit from the construction of Krishna Mandir in the capital. The very foundations of Pakistan lay in the desire of a religious minority to escape persecution and create a homeland where they would not face social, political or economic discrimination. It is indeed a cruel irony that minorities in Pakistan today face the kind of discrimination that Pakistan was created to abolish. In his oft-quoted 11th August 1947 address to the Constituent Assembly, Quaid-e-Azam himself had promised the minorities of Pakistan their right to freedom of worship:
“You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed – that has nothing to do with the business of the State.”
The purpose of Pakistan’s creation therefore will remain unfulfilled, and the vision of its founding fathers incomplete, until the constitutional rights of the country’s minorities are safeguarded.
Mistreatment of minorities also damages Pakistan’s international image, as evidenced by the USCIRF (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom) yearly reports that have regularly placed Pakistan in the CPC (Country of Particular Concern) category. Moreover, it significantly dents Pakistan’s credibility when advocating before the world community for the rights of Muslim minorities in India, Myanmar and Palestine. After all, how different are the fundamentalists who tore down the partially constructed boundary wall around Krishna Mandir’s land, from the Hindutva infected goons of RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and BJP (Bhartiya Janata Party) who demolished the Babri Masjid?
If Pakistan fails to punish the perpetrators of hate crimes against religious minorities within its own borders, what moral standing does the country have to impel other states to take action? Bringing to justice the fundamentalists who oppress religious minorities will not only improve Pakistan’s global standing, it will also lend credence to the country’s stance when championing the rights of Muslim minorities across the world.
Above all, the most important reason why the government must stand up for Pakistan’s religious minorities is because it is the right thing to do. It is the constitutional, moral and even religious responsibility of the government to safeguard the rights of the country’s non-Muslim citizens. The dreams of ‘Do Nahi Aik Pakistan’ and Naya Pakistan will not be realised until the seven million Pakistani non-Muslims are treated as equal citizens and stakeholders of their country.
Discernible improvements in mindsets and attitudes will take several years and require wide ranging reforms, but the process must start somewhere. Construction of a Mandir in Islamabad can prove to be a seminal moment; it will signal a clear change in the government’s policy vis-a-vis the country’s non-Muslim citizens and will also send an unequivocal message that the state will no longer cede space to regressive forces.
COMMENTS (36)
Shame On You for promoting stupidity and extremism
Like Mr.Saeed has said above, government funds should not have been used for mandir construction. Hindus are free to build these madirs with their own funds. No one should be discriminated against however we can only spend on and follow the lifestyle that our religion tells us to follow. Utilizing our tax money to build mandirs is not right as our money might not be getting utilized in the best manner "Islamically". Before everyone calls this offensive, think about whether the American government pays for the construction of mosques. No Islamic associations and communities pay for the construction of mosques in America. Just like that Hindu communities should pay for the construction of mandirs.
Like Mr.Saeed has said above, government funds should not have been used for mandir construction. Hindus are free to build these madirs with their own funds. No one should be discriminated against however we can only spend on and follow the lifestyle that our religion tells us to follow. Utilizing our tax money to build mandirs is not right as our money might not be getting utilized in the best manner "Islamically". Before everyone calls this offensive, think about whether the American government pays for the construction of mosques. No Islamic associations and communities pay for the construction of mosques in America. Just like that Hindu communities should pay for the construction of mandirs.
Good article and I concur.
Good article
The concern is not in building a temple. The issue is CONSTRUCTING IT WITH THE GOVT FUND. YOU, IK or anybody can fund from their pockets and construct 100s of temples. But not with my money, please ... Pakistan has lots of empty lands... Why specifically Islamabad??? In the same capital you ruined Lal Masjid, you destroyed lives of kids, girls, aged... Being a Muslim, I will never force anybody to follow Islam. Equally, I will not support anybody by any means to worship anybody other than Allah... May Allah guide us towards the correct path... Ameen
shame on you for promoting shirk.
Author needs to Know hundreds of new mosques are built every year in intolerant India. While the enlightened pakistan struggles to allow to build one temple in its capital. You guys can continue to continue to fool yourself by equating false equivalence of minority plight in India vs Pakistan. Figure out something soon before your last minority is converted.
The writer should get his facts straight. Pakistan is an Islamic country. It is a sin for Muslims to donate and/or make other worship places whether churches, temples, etc. We love our minority citizens. It is their right to practice their religion freely in Pakistan. But for that they should buy land and build temple with their own money. Because as Muslims it is Shirk if we contribute in the making of a temple. Our Hindu brothers amd sisters! We love you. But please know that it is a matter of our faith. We can not be taking part in Shirk.
Please prove with reference to constitution. How is paying to build a Mandir an obligation or even under the constitution? State provision and act.. There is no talk of rights and freedom, this is talk of who pays.
The author is posting baseless accusations by using words 'crimes against minority'. Which crimes is he talking about? And what temple is he talking about being demolished? There was no temple there, it was a barren land.
The writer is a physician, and should stick with issues concerning his profession.
already 3 mandirs in Islamabad for the 3,000 Hindus living there. Why should Pakistani government pay for people to worship idols made out of clay?
Keep your religion private. Don't mix religion and politics.
What good are you if you don't keep the promise made by quaid-e-azam?
no, pakistan can not do it. pakistan is an islamic country and we have to follow the rules of the quran. verse 8:38 of quran says that, kill all the non believers of allah. therefore we have to kill all the jews, hindus, christians, buddihist etc. further verse 9:29 of the quran says all non muslim must have pay the zizia. therefore, construction of shri krishna temple in our country is impossible.
You intentionally tried to divert the conversation towards religious tolerance which is not the issue here. The objection towards the construction of the Mandir is related to its funding. Since the government doesn't fund the construction of any masjids in the public domain, why should it fund a mandir on the tax payer dime?
Like seriously we dont need to spend the taxes of muslims to build a place for non muslims. We dont want a mandir in the capital and if they want it tell them to go to india.
So you think it's a good idea to construct a place for practicing Shirk?
Yes we do. If you are that hateful that you can’t allow a minority to practice their religion in your country what right do Muslims have in any other country In the world where they are minorities. You are disgrace to Islam.
So you think it's a good idea to construct a place to practice Shirk? To everyone that is involved, how will you answer to Allah?
Poignant reminder to us to uphold global values and not just protect but promote the welfare of our minority communities.
Hindus and Christians are equal second to majority Muslims. Both Hindus and Christians are 3 million each and form a 1.6% of the population according to Census 2017. We see many churches in Pakistan but hardly any functioning Mandirs except in Sindh. Time for Pakistan govt to be a real representative of all Pakistanis and Pakistan be a nation state.
Very well said. This is an important piece of writing. Azhar Mehmood may Allah give you wisdom and tolerance.
Very well said
The issue is not that serious ,by the way how much money had been paid to you to write such a filthy and bios piece of a substandard writing simply based on lies and hatred against Pakistan.
Alrerady written above. pl. dont miss it. I mean every word and be sad if you dont do it. Edgar
So lets break this down: 1) How can the government spend money on the worship place of one religion when it doesn't do so for any other religion? 2)How are you or any person ok with the government of Pakistan spending PKR 100 million on a worship place during such a difficult time for the country? 3) What would your reaction be if the government decides to build a mosque just like they are making a temple? 4) Your whole article is a strawman argument. Just because we oppose a temple built from a taxpayers money doesn't mean it is oppression. This doesn't come under oppression. 5) Hindus are allowed to do anything legal on their own lands. The government refusing to build a temple won't go against Jinnah's 11 August speech. 6) Not allowing a temple by built via taxpayers money doesn't mean we don't see the Hindu community as Pakistani. 7) Your name tells me you are a Muslim. Can you please say that an Islamic system is the opposite of what Jinnah said in his 11 August speech. Since what he says is tolerance, an Islamic system would be intolerant by this argument. I suggest you write about the actual oppression that i happening in this world. Regardless of religion.
I think, Pakistani govt. should allow Hindus to make their temple on their own because in 73 year history of Pakistan, no mosque has been funded by the government. Govt. should only provide them land (which has already been provided) because Pakistani govt. provide only land for mosque (which is also a very rare case). I'm an Ahmadi, the most endangered and troubled Community in Pakistan. But I think this way because it is fair to treat all communities the same way.
A simple question that we need to ask, How much is the Hindu population in Islamabad? It is not even 0.5%. Then, why are doing it? Build it where it matters like in Sindh. Nobody will object that.
Well contributing to help other financially and by any other means is a charitable thing to do but when it comes to contributing to some one religious beliefs that's totally another matter , I mean what happens in a temple is shirk with out any shread of doubt and is the highest crime against The Almighty and when a Muslim contribute in such charity in any type of gesture is simply doing the worst sin(shirk) ever no doubt about it . So all of you even after knowing that won't be able to justify your actions , remember that. Because the picture is pretty clear. As a Muslim state the best thing to do is not to contribute in anyway .
👍👍👍👍
A very well written masterpiece. People like you are much needed sir👍
Thank you so much sir for speaking boldly for minorities. People like you are much needed here in our country. Secondly a point is that when we can appreciate other countries for religious freedom then why cant we let our country be appreciated for the same thing. This is the best thing I have ever read on the internet.👍👍👍👍
Totally denied from your statement. Issue is that minorities in Pakistan continously enjoying their freedom since creation of nation. Their is no need to build a new temple from government funds. Hindus from their own investment rebuild temples if needed. According to current scenario all development funds are abolished. Than what is need for government funded temple.
Well it’s true and there is need to find religious scholars with open minds in main stream media to convince public and there are many Muslims states like Dubai and others who allow mandir on their land otherwise whole country will become hostage. We Pakistanis are very much loving and caring nation but due to terrorism have become symbol of extremist nation. We can just see the remarks of foreigner who visited Pakistan and they say their perceptions have completely changed a about Pakistan after visiting the country and by interacting with Pakistani people
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ