The social construction of gender merely internalises the belief that men and women are essentially different due to biology and therefore gender imbalance in the society is merely a ‘natural’ phenomenon. PHOTO: TUMBLR

Dear sexist men, your privileged gender is not an outcome of your “biological” qualities, but of social conditioning

Men think that gender roles are based on biology and that our genitals determine the power imbalance and roles we play

Raza Habib Raja July 24, 2017
Recently, I wrote an article based on two recent videos which went viral. The main idea behind the article was to showcase two outstanding individuals who challenged gender stereotypes instead of conforming to society’s prescribed gender roles, going on to live their individual dreams.

For me, these individuals are heroes and, in fact, trailblazers as they have challenged socially constructed stereotypes. These stereotypes play a large role in determining what is expected of men and women from society. By spelling out these expectations and enforcing them through upbringing and cultural norms, men and women are often regimented into different roles and hence, destinies. These different roles also largely account for the gender imbalance, giving men an advantage and power that cannot be attributed to biological traits alone.

The reaction to the article on social media, particularly Facebook, was interesting. Considering the great schism between the views when it comes to gender equality and a woman’s rightful place in society, I was expecting a lot of heterogeneity in the reaction. The central premise that socially-constructed gender roles hamper women resonated with many women – understandably, as they experience limitations because of such roles. Men predictably gave a diverse reaction. Some agreed, while others disagreed. Those who disagreed used either religion or biology to justify themselves.

The reactions which drew upon biology tried to explain the existing gender role differences through biological differences. One comment touted as to how men are more aggressive and have greater upper body strength and this idea of not recognising the difference can be a dangerous one. Likewise, it was also argued that a woman’s brain is more emotional and therefore more expressive, whereas a man is said to have a more ‘logical’ brain. One commentator further extended this logic and argued that existing gender roles are merely an outcome of our biology and society’s assessment of what ‘works’.

Photo: Screenshot

Photo: Screenshot

Most of these comments were from men who think that their superior position in life is not because of the way society prioritises men over women but because men are somehow born that way. They think that gender roles are based on biology and our genitals have ultimately determined the power imbalance and the kind of roles we play in our lives.

I would like to clarify a few things here. First of all, this attitude reeks of crude sexism which is trying to find refuge in biology. Many privileged men think their privileged position in life is not because of a cultural set up they were born into, but because of their ‘in born’ qualities.

Second, I am not throwing biology out as there is no doubt that men and women are not identical. On average, both the genders are different. No one is contesting the differences. However, such differences are merely average and do not map well to individual level and therefore should not become the basis for adopting across the board discriminatory rules.

Third, not all of these differences are merely an outcome of biology. In reality, nature and nurture both combine together to shape us. Here, I would like to further point out that no two men are identical or for that matter equal in every respect of the way. Irrespective of our gender, we are all unique in some way or the other.

However the kind of roles we are expected to play in our lives are not dependent on our ‘uniqueness’, but largely what, on average, society has already determined for us. Men are expected to be breadwinners, aggressive and dominant. Women, in contrast, are expected to be submissive and docile. These roles are largely an outcome of social conditioning, not our biology. The social construction of gender merely internalises the belief that men and women are essentially different due to biology and therefore gender imbalance in society is merely a ‘natural’ phenomenon.

Yes, obviously there are biological differences, but both genders face different constraints and incentives based largely on social set ups and conditioning. Biological differences may explain why men, on average, may be potentially better in some professions and women better in others, but social constraints and expectations determine whether women will even be allowed to do a particular job.

In our part of society, a working and independent woman is largely frowned upon, a fact which deters many women to even want to pursue a profession, particularly professions considered appropriate for men.

If biology was the sole determinant, there should not have been so many differences in gender parity across various societies as the biological differences in men and women are the same everywhere. For example, in advanced societies, gender expectations and roles are not as radically different as they are in our society, and consequently there you see women in literally every field of life. Yes, in some jobs women are better than men and in some men are better, but nevertheless, women get a fair chance and they have not only capitalised on it but shown that they can be equal and even excel men.

Over the last 30 years, the female to male ratio of college students has changed dramatically and now more females have begun to enrol in colleges. This ratio has changed because of the evolution of the notion that women do not solely need to be housewives. Women have also consistently outperformed men in academics. Even the traditional gap in science subjects is gradually decreasing. Besides academics, due to more balanced gender roles and expectations, the schism between the genders has decreased as we even see some women embracing “masculine” traits.

We should be striving for a society where both men and women should be allowed to develop according to their natural potential. The existing social conditioning by regimenting men and women into starkly different roles is hampering that. Instead of crudely reducing everything to biology and trying to normalise power imbalances, we need to take a more nuanced and thoughtful approach.
WRITTEN BY:
Raza Habib Raja

The writer is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the Maxwell School of Public Affairs, Syracuse University. He regularly writes for the Express Tribune, HuffPost, Daily Times and Naya Daur. He tweets https://twitter.com/razaraja">@razaraja

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (29)

ernest baza | 7 years ago | Reply Im a female,I was deeply touched by this article,considering there are many good men out there who speak for the rights of opposite gender,I know pysiologically and psychologically male and female are a bit different,but we are not that different either, in the end we are all humans.Im not victomizing the females who partially are responsible for their own agony sadly, but lets start with our houses, we see our dads working from 8-4:00 in office,I know its difficult for them,the pressure if earning, facing the boss etc,many of mothers in our society are housewives but let me make it clear, its not easy there aswell dudes,have you ever seen your mom sitting idle either? She is cooking class food 3 times a day, cleaning whole huge house,taking care of husband,granny,grandpa and other in laws,their critical thoughts about her,them presurizing her to do this and that. And finally the biggest battle of all raising 3 or 4 kids, having to go through pregnancy,feeding babies not being able to sleep for whole night,changing diapers,then the growing kids,sending them to school teaching them at house,always stressed about abiding by rules of in laws.my mother like many othersworks aswell, I see her working sweat and tears at home after school,preparing tests,checking them,giving assignments, going to workshops for teaching,while my father comes around 4 after which he is watching TV,asking for this and that,now don't tell me your fathers help your mothers in kitchen or taking care of kids, its rare in our society...do you call this fair? I don't think so.And I've witnessed many domestic abuse cases carried by husbands against their wives around my neighbourhood,even men shouting at their mothers? Tell me you would want the same for your mothers and daughters?would you?I know you wouldn't as its unethical.Our society expects females to bear with whatever rulthless behavious her inlaws are doing with her,thats insane and sadly they accept it. Not every female wants to be a housewive and cook for their husbands and his family like a masterchef,or listen to them ordering her around , many of us want to achieve a carrier like men want to,if our society really wants to overcome being a third world nation to become real advanced like other nations we have start acting like one,the prime solution is to reduce this sexism, I know nothing can be done about 100% population, but alteast we can try, the Youngs and kids should be raised to be better and educated about this issue.
RHR | 7 years ago | Reply Aap tu jazbaati ho gai!
Asim | 7 years ago That's rich coming from a guy who attacks ordinary people on Facebook using his journalistic privilege. A Journalist and a troll. Add those to your list of achievements.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ