Pakistan vs India: Play Akhtar and Ajmal

If I were to have any say in the team selection, I would certainly go for Saeed Ajmal and Shoaib Akhtar.

Shaukat Hamdani March 29, 2011
The Pakistan team faces a bowling dilemma as it prepares for the semi-final in Mohali.

Umar Gul, Abdur Razzaq, Muhammad Hafeez and Shahid Afridi will most certainly be on the team.

The questions to be answered are:

  1. Who will be the third spinner?

  2. Who will be the third seamer?

Here’s a SWOT analysis:

Third Spinner: Saeed Ajmal or Abdul Rehman?

Saeed Ajmal

Strength:  Ajmal offers the amazing doosra and a whole lot of variety. Once he gets into rhythm he can pick up wickets at will.

Weakness: Unfortunately, he can be expensive if off color and at times in pressure situations, he tends to overuse the doosra.

Opportunity: He will provide an opportunity to the Pakistan team to strike at the heart of the Indian batting lineup. A few wickets in the middle overs could potentially trigger a late order collapse of the Indian batting order, similar to happened against South Africa, West Indies and England.

Threat: The pitch at Mohali probably will not suit spinners. So unless he is taking wickets,  Ajmal is can be a bit expensive.

Abdul Rehman

Strength: Rehman has extreme control over line and length and rarely ever goes for a lot of runs.

Weakness: He will most likely not give a match winning performance, and is more of a run stopper than a wicket taker.

Opportunity:  He is more than capable of drying up the runs if the need arises, especially if Pakistan have already posted a large total and do not need to bowl the opposition out.

Threat: If Pakistan becomes desperate for wickets, he is not a person that can be expected to topple the Indian batting lineup.

Third Seamer: Shoaib Akhtar or Wahab Riaz?

Shoaib Akhtar

Strength: Akhtar’s got raw pace and a more intelligent cricketing brain now than he had in his youth.

Weakness: His fitness issues may be problematic, he can get tired fast and lose control of his bowling.

Opportunity:  Akhtar can pick up quick wickets and has the capability to run through the Indian batting lineup.  A few well directed and fast short ones can also rattle the Indians.

Threat: On a batting track he can be expensive if he does not hit the right areas. Batsmen like Tendulker and Sehwag can use his pace to hit him around the stadium.

Wahab Riaz

Strength: Riaz brings the variation of a left arm seamer to the bowling attack and can create an angle to get a nick to the keeper.

Weakness:  He lacks the ability to bring the ball back into the right handed batsmen and can offer too much width at times.

Opportunity: Will be able to bowl across the Indian batsman and might incite a false drive or cut shot.

Threat: Unfortunately, he is a bit one dimensional, which can be a problem when he comes against a very good Indian batting lineup.

My winning combo

If I were to have any say in the team selection, I would certainly go for Saeed Ajmal and Shoaib Akhtar. Both are the more aggressive choices and I firmly believe if we are to win this match we would have to either bowl the Indian team out or come close to it.

Not only is the Indian batting lineup good enough to post a huge score if we do not take wickets, a big total will also get the hostile Indian crowd pumped up.

The best way to deflect the home crowd pressure from themselves onto the Indian team would be to take quick wickets. If we can do this, the Indian team might panic.

The Indian team is good enough to resist a siege by Pakistan; Pakistan will have to go for an all out invasion.

Let’s hope for success!
Shaukat Hamdani Broadcast journalist with an interest in sports, travel, history and culture. He tweets @Shaukii
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (3) | 13 years ago | Reply @Saadi azeem: lol saadi
Saadi azeem | 13 years ago | Reply Swot*
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ