No 'good' or 'bad' Taliban

The Pakistani version of Taliban has also gone under a metamorphosis. What started as local Taliban or neo Taliban were then called fasadis and now terrorists. Following the US’s mulling over withdrawal from Afghanistan, they came to be classified into good and bad.

Manzoor Ali Shah July 09, 2010


Militancy has not only changed the lives of countless people in territories east of the Durand Line, but also made several drone and suicide attacks, Taliban and Blackwater, household terms across the country.

The Pakistani version of Taliban has also gone under a metamorphosis. What started as local Taliban or neo Taliban were then called fasadis and now terrorists. Following the US’s mulling over withdrawal from Afghanistan, they came to be classified into good and bad.

The ‘good’ Taliban in Afghanistan are those ready to enter into talks with the US-led coalition and those who do not attacks Pakistani targets. Also, those who dispatch fighters against US forces in Afghanistan are taken as ‘good’ and those who attack Pakistani security forces and civilians in cities are ‘bad’. It is perhaps because of this distinction that the Punjabi Taliban are seen as ‘bad’ Taliban.

Contrary to their Afghan counterparts, the Pakistani Taliban have proved to be a more deadly breed. The army had to go into the mountains of Swat in the north and Waziristan in the northwest in pursuit of these ‘bad’ Taliban. The war is raging on and there is little hope that this conflict will die down soon.

This whole scenario is the product of the erroneous approach of using the flawed principle of ‘strategic depth’ vis-à-vis Afghanistan.

Only recently, Amnesty International released a detailed report titled “As if hell fell on me,” on the conflict zone within our borders. It claimed that four million people are living under the Taliban rule and have been abandoned by the state. The government was quick to reject this report as baseless. Then the London School of Economics released a report which accused the ISI of funding and training the Afghan Taliban. The government rejected this as well.

Our security establishment’s romance with jihad proved to be the proverbial sowing winds and reaping whirlwinds. The jihadists trained against India and for making Afghanistan our stooge have turned against us. Why don’t our policymakers realise that there are no ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban?

Published in The Express Tribune, June 30th, 2010.

WRITTEN BY:
Manzoor Ali Shah A reporter for The Express Tribune.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (6)

Syed Muhammad Waqas Shabir | 10 years ago | Reply as they call it... "Policy Change" :)
Syed Muhammad Waqas Shabir | 10 years ago | Reply Further to my earlier comments; I have watched a documentary on PTV projecting the the soul of word 'Talib' and their positive efforts for revival of good in areas where society was deteriorated by opium, child molestation, honor killings, etc. etc. and so Talibans were the agent of change in Afghanistan (for good)... Then after few months till today; I see Talibs as the most negative creature on earth :) I saw that with my own eyes and that too on PTV... Ghalati say chal gaei hogi shayad :) lolzzz
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ