Media Watchdog
Can you imagine a world without Wikipedia?

Can you imagine a world without Wikipedia?

If Wikipedia's fundraising drive is unsuccessful, it will not exist next year. Will you donate?

Hassan Asif December 15, 2010

“Wikipedia only works in practice. In theory, it's a total disaster.”

Wikipedia, supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, has accumulated over 17 million articles in 262 languages as well as inspired copycats in Google and Facebook (see Google Knol and Facebook Community Pages). It still, however, does not have money to keep the site running - nor does it want to charge money or display ads on its websites.

If you’ve been to the Wikipedia website lately, you might have seen a banner at the top of the page that says “Please read: A personal appeal from Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner.”

Wikipedia is one of the web’s hottest properties but it faces the same problem that has been faced by many internet startups: how does one monetise the site? Even commercial websites such as Twitter and the New York Times have had trouble trying to find revenue models for the web.

Wikipedia has opted to start a fund-raising drive hoping to turn more of its 400 million readers into donors. According to Wikimedia’s Gardner:

“We have to raise $8 million more. If all of our readers donated $1, the fundraiser would be over about four hours from now. But not everyone can or will donate, and that’s fine.”

While Britannica and Encarta sell their material on discs or books while having the same amount of “serious errors”, Wikipedia is used free of charge. Most of us will stop using Wikipedia if there is a subscription fee but none of us will be using Wikipedia next year as only half the fundraising goal has been reached with less than 3 weeks of the year remaining.

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales’ advice should be heeded:

“If you value Wikipedia as a source of information – and a source of inspiration – I hope you’ll choose to act right now.”

I think this one is a no-brainer: save Wikipedia and donate $1 (approximately Rs85) with your credit card here!

Update: Wikipedia reached its stated goal on January 1, 2011. It will remain ad-free.

WRITTEN BY:
Hassan Asif

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (19)

llllll | 13 years ago | Reply Your comments may appear in The Express Tribune paper. For this reason we encourage you to provide your email. The Express Tribune does not bear any responsibility for user comments.

Noor-ul-ain Hanif | 13 years ago | Reply Nice post, good useful site but the option of editing in not gud! any one can edit the answer and most of the times I fond error in it!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS

Raqib Ali | 13 years ago | Reply Wiki will be there next year. It simply cannot fail.

waqar shaikh | 13 years ago | Reply Great article Hassan. You accurately mentioned the importance of Wikipedia and its a fact we all should accept that we badly need Wikipedia in all years to come. When it comes to donate the main problem lies with Pakistanis are the medium they would use. Wikipedia accepts donation through Credit Card and PayPal account only, and in Pakistan people are un-aware of Paypal and Credit Card is not that common, so many of the dedicated donors from Pakistan are unable to donate even if they would have want to. In my opinion there must be some alternative modes when accepting donation from the whole world.

SirSEO | 13 years ago | Reply Wikipedia a growing public encylopedia of over 4 million articles on subjects on the Internet; registered users may freely edit content of these articles. Great article thanks

zaigham | 13 years ago | Reply no wiki next year? but it will leave its legacy in the form of wiki-intellectuals... which i believe is quite a horrible legacy...

Shashi | 13 years ago | Reply Sorry, I didn't realize you were talking about Pakistani Rupee. Please delete previous as well as this comment. Thank you.

Shashi | 13 years ago | Reply 1 USD = Rs 46

Raqib Ali | 13 years ago | Reply I think Wikipedia should start putting selective ads (not overdo it). Most people only pay when you get the money first. After using the service, only a few generous wants to pay. If Wikipedia has a business model that relies on emotional appeals, then let them reap the rewards (I'm not being mean, just pointing that majority wouldn't care). Wikipedia needs to work with Student Unions across the world to do fund raising. Many people only pay when you approach them and facilitate the process.

Pakeezah | 13 years ago | Reply Wikipedia doesn't carry all the right information. Almost anyone can edit the information which proves that it is in some cases, wrong. So there's no point in funding that unless the information is checked and approved by the Wikipedia admin.

Asad | 13 years ago | Reply @Mahvesh: I completely agree with you. :) As for the payment, just borrow a credit card from a family member. It's a pretty simple procedure from there on. @Amna: Yes, there are indeed many worthwhile causes to donate to. Giving a little to help spread knowledge shouldn't stop you from helping others.

Mahvesh | 13 years ago | Reply I'd have donated except I'm completely clueless about online payments :( Need to find someone to pay at least $5, if only it's to annoy peopel like Irfan Ahmed who'd rather ban the internet because it'll bring in unwanted information.

Amna | 13 years ago | Reply I would not donate. Not because i do not use wikipedia and do not find it resourceful, but because I think there are way too many other places to donate money. People starving and shelterless are a priority to me as far as donating money is concerned.

Shueyb Gandapur | 13 years ago | Reply Totally agree. I have used wikipedia extensively for obtaining knowledge. The level of information one finds on wikipedia cannot be found in any other online or printed encyclopedia. It would be just a small token of gratitude and acknowledgement if we make a small donation. Without wikipedia, the world will be much poorer. I have done my part last year and this year and will continue to do so every year.

Irfan Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply I would prefer this bias site go to drain. They hurt the feelings of millions of Muslims by putting Muhammed(P.B.U.H.) picture on their site. Usually they accept complains and let people edit but in this particular case they lock the article for editing. bye bye Wikipedia.

Atika.rehman | 13 years ago | Reply

Really liked your blog Hassan! I won't use Wikipedia as a source when i'm writing a research paper, but i use it nearly everyday. When i say i want to "google it" i usually mean i want to "wiki it". Great piece.

Abdul Muqeet | 13 years ago | Reply Probably going to donate via my PayPal, They have helped a lot and without them it was never possible to know that much

Umair Kazi | 13 years ago | Reply Although I agree that we should donate for this resource that we all love.. I think the threat is sort of artificial. I bet Wikipedia could avert its financial ruin (and keep it afloat for another year) by running ads for 2-3 days!

Asad Shairani | 13 years ago | Reply This deserved a writeup. Good job.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Can you imagine a world without Wikipedia?

More by this writer

FOLLOW US