Before we turn into WikiFreaks...
For all their juicy disclosures, the leaked memos are not 'the truth' with a capital T.
Excuse me, while I jump on the bandwagon and hail the unprecedented revelation of global espionage. The revelation of a quarter of a million classified diplomatic cables of the United States is no mean feat.
Ordinarily, a quarter of a million journalists would have made their careers if they were fortunate enough to gain access to each of those documents individually. But must we be blinded by the incredulity of such an event to the point that we forget to question what the revelations really are?
For all their juicy and gripping disclosures, the leaked memos are not the truth with a capital T.
The documents are correspondences of American diplomats posted at embassies across the world. Therefore, at best, they provide an interesting insight into American foreign policy and how these individual diplomats perceived the world around them. Unless you lend omniscience to these individuals, some of the memos and their revelations are as close to being the truth as our conspiracy theories.
As for the who said what against whom, it is nothing more than glorified gossip, once you account for the occasional errors that are bound to have occurred during translations.
That does not mean that all of it is false. The diplomats were not imbeciles. However, individually, and as nation states, we will accept those revelations as true that conform to our own narratives and discard the rest as conspiracies. Invariably, when the dust settles, we will trudge along on our usual paths.
However, for historians and academics, the memos will continue to serve as a treasure trove – one they will examine, critique and then use to conjecture fresh perspectives on our age.
I will reserve any sweeping alterations to my worldview until then.