Why women will vote for Bernie Sanders rather than Hillary Clinton

For women in the developing world the ‘Hillary Clinton feminist conundrum’ is a very distant issue.

Aseela Haque February 11, 2016
The results of the New Hampshire primary have precipitated two distinct dialogues on the 2016 US Presidential race. The first one is marked with apprehension, unease and incredulous recognition of Donald Trump’s massive win. The second one is an attempt to understand the feminist underpinnings of the young women who are choosing to support Bernie Sanders instead of Hillary Clinton.

Nobody could have anticipated that Clinton would have a problem getting support from women, yet in Iowa, Sanders received the female vote six to one, and in New Hampshire, 64 per cent of female democratic voters chose him.

So, what happened? How is Clinton losing women?

Well, the fact is that Clinton is not losing all women. She still has the support of older women, just not women 29-years-old and younger. The millennial women have most older American feminists exasperated. This moment, right now, is a chance for women to make history and elect a female president. This is a decisive point in the feminist movement which began in the US in 1848. So why is the American female youth copiously “feeling the Bern”?

Gloria Steinham, an American journalist and spokeswoman for the feminist movement in the 60s, has said that “younger women aren’t serious in their politics” and the reason they are supporting Sanders is because the “boys are with Bernie”.

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright at Clinton’s rally in New Hampshire said,
“There is a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.”

With a cursory look at the generational divide of the American feminists, I can’t help but feel that the apparatus for feminist discourse has significantly changed since the 60s. Young women have managed to evolve from the feminist narrative of the past, and I don’t believe they should be chastised for it. They recognise that voting on the basis of gender is sexist in itself. This election for them is not about putting a woman in office. It’s about healthcare, security, college debts and equal pay.

If so, has the discussion on the 2016 US presidential elections transcended gender discourse?

Not entirely.

You see, Sanders is a feminist too. So when young women choose Sanders over Clinton, they do not think their actions are anti-feminist. In fact, they believe that their choice is a distinct assertion of their feminist ideals. They are picking a candidate who has ardently spoken about making public colleges tuition free.

For the average female college student, who will take a lot longer to pay off her college debts due to the gender pay gap, Sanders presents a feminist agenda that resonates more strongly than Clinton’s.

Photo: New York Times

Clinton talks about breaking “the highest, hardest ceiling”. She believes that electing a female president will achieve that – that fathers will be able to tell their daughters that they can be president too. But that’s not what the American female population can afford to concern themselves with at the moment.
“It’s not about gender. It’s about empathy,”

Said Jetta Darrow, a 63-year-old office administrator for a civil-engineering company, who voted for Clinton in the New Hampshire primary in 2008, but chose Sanders a few days ago.

Sanders’ socialist ideals war against Wall Street and emphasis on equality is echoing more strongly with a population that feels too crushed by economic strains than grand feminist agendas that involve breaking ceilings. For women in the developing world the ‘Hillary Clinton feminist conundrum’ is a very distant issue. Although many of us would love to see a woman become the most powerful person in the world, Clinton is too deeply attached to the American political establishment, and perhaps she is too much of a first world feminist, to stand out as a female figure who cares about women everywhere.

It is much more exciting to consider how Sanders’ anti-capitalist ideals and policies of equality could change the world.

Are you “feeling the Bern”?

[poll id="429"]
Aseela Haque The author studied Political Science at the Lahore University of Management Sciences. She tweets as @aseelahaque
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

Facebook Conversations


siesmann | 4 years ago | Reply | Recommend Women are often the opponents of women,and American women are no exception, Bernie Sander can't defeat a Republican candidate.Republicans will pounce upon his socialist agenda,and label him a communist, an entity Americans fear as much as Muslim these days.
Mary McCulley | 4 years ago | Reply | Recommend Exciting, but not realistic. Most women are supporting Hillary. And I think the fact that younger women may prefer Sanders points to issues with younger generations in general...very high expectations that the world revolves around them. I never expected my college to be "free." My parents worked and saved for me to attend college, I worked in college, I applied for scholarships and low-cost loans, and lived very frugally. I've had graduate students tell me during a 2 year master's program how they have no time for a social life. Wow, that was never my expectation when I went back for a graduate degree...I was there to work hard and get everything I could out of those two years in school. What I discovered working in higher education was that you never "fail" a student, and they get dozens of chances to "get it right." They expect to have things paid for and given to them. That's why Sanders appeals to them. If they understood the struggles that women have had to get where they are in society today, they might understand why it's important to elect a woman president who is HIGHLY qualified to be president, for the first time in history.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ