The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part I – It’s the taking part that counts

Mockingjay Part I is quite literally a world apart from the pageantry and spectacle of the two previous instalments.

Aleyha Ahemed November 26, 2014
A muttering, foetal Katniss Everdeen confronts us from within the dark underbelly of District 13 in the opening shots of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part I catapulting us into an unequivocal new era for The Hunger Games saga.

From these first scenes, the tone is set for a grittier exploration into the dirty tactics of war and the casualties suffered by those unwillingly swept up in its path. Set predominantly in the subterranean world of District 13 – once thought to have been annihilated by the Capitol – now the nucleus of Panem rebel activityMockingjay Part I is quite literally a world apart from the pageantry and spectacle of the two previous instalments.

Photo: The Hunger Games Official Facebook Page

Spearheading the rebel effort in 13 is President Alma Coin (a measured, charismatic Julianne Moore) whose district has weaponed up and hunkered down, ready and waiting to be led into battle by their returning Mockingjay. But once rescued by Coin, along with tribute Finnick (Sam Claflin) and formerly flamboyant chaperone Effie (Elizabeth Banks), Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) struggles to fulfil her role as the poster child of a war she never intended on waging.

Photo: The Hunger Games Official Facebook Page

It is only the revelation that Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) is still alive and being used for propaganda in the Capitol’s media campaign, combined with a trip to the decimated District 12, that sets Katniss off on a journey of self-rediscovery. There follow some exquisite, at times darkly humorous scenes that address the manipulation of the media and its darlings by both sides – a theme touched upon in previous films – but this time eschewing the easy markers of good and evil by bringing the focus on the individual instead.

Now that the Games have been committed to memory by the fateful trajectory of Katniss’s arrow in The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, there is understandably a dearth of heightened life or death tension that inherently propelled the earlier films forward. While this element is initially replaced by a call-to-action for our reluctant heroine Katniss, it is unceremoniously diminished as her leadership qualities seem only really spurred on by witnessing atrocities (insert dramatic but contrived scenes portraying the beastliness of the Capitol) and this can come across as false.

Photo: The Hunger Games Official Facebook Page

Despite this, there are several great action sequences involving a dam, bomber planes, a rescue mission and an animal-based danger point that our modern audience can relate to, at least more so than the concept of the Quarter Quells. Beautifully shot, you cannot fault these sequences on the CGI, which is great across the board – from the movements of hovering jet planes right down to the harrowing scenes of death and destruction in the districts ravaged by the rule of President Snow (a welcome return by the legendary Donald Sutherland).

The build up of the film certainly owes a lot to its older cast members. The late great Philip Seymour Hoffman reprises his role as the avuncular yet shrewd Plutarch Heavensbee – who, along with Jennifer Lawrence, gives these films a solid grounding and without whom there would be a distinct lack of gravitas in key scenes.

Photo: The Hunger Games Official Facebook Page

In the grand scheme of young-adult fiction film franchises, critics tend to abhor the customary hacking of the final book into two lucrative films as a cynical studio money-making scam, ultimately scorning part I as a dragged out, superfluous affair while fans, on the whole, relish the chance to eke out their enjoyment as long as possible.

As someone who is definitely not in the target demographic for these films, I cannot claim to be a diehard fan but, in my mind, this is the best film yet and possibly of all these young adult franchises, ever.
Aleyha Ahemed A London-based filmmaker. She has lived in Barcelona, St. Petersburg, Colombo and Karachi and writes on films. She tweets as @aleyhaa (
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

Facebook Conversations


Unknown | 5 years ago | Reply | Recommend I think Christopher Nolan is the only director these days, who aims to make his movies remembered.
IceColdFire | 5 years ago And in that single sentence lies the biggest problem with Nolan. He tries too hard to be memorable. So much so it hurts the quality of his film i.e. The Dark Knight Rises and Interstellar.
Maximus Decimus Meridius | 5 years ago | Reply | Recommend Books were good. Movie is not that good because cast is not that good. Although there are a few exceptions. Even though it will gross lots of money at the opening weekend. Tbh I have seen a recent shift in movie making, they no longer aim to be remembered for decades, they just want their reward in the first 4 weeks and then the movie is gone from the minds of the general public.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ