The Aam Aadmi Party is good news for democracy in India

It is the 'aam aadmi' who will now decide India’s fate, not Narendra Modi or the Gandhi family.

Sapan Kapoor December 26, 2013
Staring at the sky while lying on a wooden plank in the media section at Ram Lila ground – the venue of anti-corruption crusader Anna Hazare’s fast until death for a strong anti-corruption ombudsman – I am rapt in thinking about the fascinating revolution that is taking place in India. At a stone’s throw away, Hazare is spending the first night of his fast until death in his private chamber.

It is also my first night of reporting for the Press Trust of India at the venue.

It seems that the sky is also being economical in the use of light tonight for it has extinguished all its candles, that is, stars. In these dark yet enlightening hours, sleep hangs heavy on my eyelids. Yet, I do not wish to sleep for I want to enjoy every moment of my stay here. Verily, nobody will sleep here tonight, not even that young reporter of NDTV who, at some distance, is rehearsing an interview that she is going to conduct anon. She pauses for a second and looks at me with a faint smile on her visage. These are indeed exciting times for young journalists like us, for we are witnessing history being made in front of our very eyes.

While talking to another journalist, I prophesied,
“Something spectacular is going to happen in India before long.”

Two years later that prophecy seems to be coming true. Aam Aadmi Party – an offshoot of Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement – led by the Gandhian’s erstwhile protégé Arvind Kejriwal, is set to form a government in Delhi. Kejriwal, whose fledgling party launched just a year ago flabbergasted everyone with its tremendous success in the recently held polls in Delhi, is the state’s youngest chief minister. His party has won 28 seats out of a total of 70.

Prior to the elections, nobody including senior journalists and political pundits, gave the AAP a thought.

Truly speaking, sitting in their air-conditioned offices, these intellectuals failed to estimate the kind of impact Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement had had on the ground in Delhi and in India at large.

The people of India, who are sick and tired of the corruption and Hindu-Muslim politics of mainstream parties, such as the Indian National Congress (INC), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the likes, see the AAP as a breath of fresh air and a ray of hope. AAP, with its refreshing ideals, is setting the rules of the game for others to follow.

For instance the BJP, which had won 32 seats – just four short of the magic number 36 to form a government in Delhi – would have indulged in horse-trading and bought elected Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) through cash. This hitherto has been a common practice in India’s politics. But the BJP refrained from doing any such thing, sensing the prevailing anti-corruption mood of the public. This highlighted the AAP’s strong emphasis on following non-corrupt practices in politics. The Congress, which was decimated in the state elections with just 8 MLAs, ironically, offered ‘unconditional’ support to the AAP, enabling the latter to form the government.

For those who know how governments are formed in India starting from the local body level to the central government, this is a refreshing development. For instance, after the recently held municipal polls in my locality an independent elected representative was allegedly ‘abducted’ by the Congress so that no other party could approach and ‘buy’ him. Political parties in India play all kinds of dirty tricks to win elections such as distributing free liquor on the eve of voting or buying votes through cash.

The winning candidates, on the other hand, sell themselves to the highest bidder. Indian politics has become so rotten that people see it as a ‘dirty game’, which they simply cannot play. All this is going to change in India now, for the common man has risen and taken the broom in his hand to clean up India’s dirt. AAP’s victory in Delhi is a step in this direction.

Kejriwal's party has shown that it means business.

One of the most important priorities of the AAP is to end the VIP culture in India. To set an example, Chief Minister Kejriwal has refused to take security from the Delhi police saying that,
“God is my biggest security.”

Moreover, in an unprecedented move, Kejriwal and his ministers have promised not to take up residence in Delhi’s opulent bungalows allotted to them and pledged to abolish what is seen as the most ‘offensive symbol’ of the VIP culture – red beacons or lal battis on vehicles. No AAP minister will ride in a lal batti car in Delhi. For this one move alone, Kejriwal and his team deserve a huge round of applause.

Let me take this opportunity to make another prophecy.

This AAP phenomenon will not be limited to Delhi alone. The fragrance of this wonderful movement will spread across India before long and change the way politics is conducted here. The party, on its part, has made known that it has national ambitions and that it will fight the 2014 general elections. In view of their impressive performance in Delhi, no party would make the mistake of taking them lightly. They will do so at their own peril.

One thing has become clear – it is the aam aadmi (common man) who will now decide India’s fate and redeem our tryst with destiny in full measure, not Narendra Modi or the Gandhi family.

As Kejriwal says,
Jab yeh aam aadmi khada ho jaata hai na toh acchhe acchhe sihansan dol jaate hain.

(When the common man rises, the strongest of power centres shake and crumble.)

AAP is good news for India's democracy. Its emergence also augurs well for Indo-Pak relations because the aam aadmi will make peace with Pakistan.
WRITTEN BY:
Sapan Kapoor A history buff and India-based journalist, the author has worked with the Press Trust of India. He blogs at sehar-anawakening.blogspot.in/ and tweets as @dRaconteur.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (37)

Sameer | 10 years ago | Reply the writer is a closeted leftist or congressi who now wants to use AAP to pull down BJP. "the people of India, who are sick and tired of the corruption and Hindu-Muslim politics of mainstream parties, such as the Indian National Congress (INC), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) " other than you Mr Kapoor, people in general are not sick and tired of BJP. BJP won an unprecdented 70% of the assembly seats in the recently concluded assembly polls. even in Delhi, BJP was the No 1 Party. 70% seats to BJP and you telling that people fed up of Modi and BJP because one party, with almost entire top leadership from delhi, came second in a small city election in delhi based primarily on municipal issues.
Creative | 10 years ago The election results show that where there was no alternative people voted for BJP. But where a viable alternative was present like in Delhi people went for it. Same thing is going to happen in 2014. AAP will provide an alternative to the people of India.
Indian | 10 years ago | Reply Queen - As an Indian, I appreciate your very mature and well balanced reply! It is rare that we have any kind of intelligent and thoughtful discussion between Indians and Pakistanis in the comments section of any news article. Most often the discussions deteriorate into very abusive language on both sides with often the threat of using nuclear weapons by some commentators!! (A sign of the immature and non-civil population on both sides of the border). People from India try to be snooty and superior with the usual "we are democracy" "we are secular" "our army is bigger" "You guys are rabid dangerous terrorists" etc. (all of the above are a very colored view of Pakistan) Pakistanis blame India for Bangladesh division not realizing that India's involvement just acted as a catalyst that accelerated the creation of the inevitable, but India was not the root cause. The wound was really self inflicted by not respecting the Bengali as equal human beings but seeing them as a racially inferior human beings. It is this tone of racial superiority from the ethnic Punjabis and the resulting policies from them that resulted in the formation of Bangladesh.. not India's involvement. As far as Kashmir is concerned, my understanding is that at present Kashmiri muslims feel alienated from India and our army is working like an occupation force rather than a security force, and if this policy of our country continues in terms of treating Kashmir as a security problem rather than a people's alienation issue.. it would be difficult for India to keep Kashmir as an integral part of India in the long term. My firm belief is that Kashmiris might have already won some sort of autonomy by now if Pakistan had not intervened militarily and through irregular forces. By intervening militarily and through jihadists in Kashmir - Pakistan is helping India by painting the Kashmir struggle as an Islamic terrorist relegious-fundamentalist problem rather than a struggle for self determination. In that sense Pakistan has been one of the worst enemies of Kashmiri self determination as Pakistani involvement has tarnished Kashmiri self determination struggle in the international eye. Lastly about the pakistani media and current affair talk shows - I find them definitely of a far higher quality than Indian media talk shows. I really respect the range of thought space that is given to the political thinkers and commentators on Pakistani media who go so far as to even question the logic behind creation of Pakistan something no Indian commentator can do on Indian TV and question our policy on Kashmir and still have a job after that. I am sad to say that Indian current affairs programs work within a very narrow pro-establishment range of debate and really widely different perspectives are not heard. To be honest, we do not have the range and variety of debate on current affairs program that are there on Pakistani TV on Indian TV. Indian TV has become deeply commercialized, superficial, TRP and profit driven and have incorporated the worst of hollow inconsequential media reporting that we find in American TV. In the end the only way forward for us is to live together peacefully and respectfully and the gusy on both sides who say that we should destroy the other are the elites who are already financially secure and commercial interests outside and won't be impacted by war Enough of my rant :) I would appreciate some thoughtful and intelligent perspective on this from other commentators
Queen | 10 years ago Hi Mr Indian, It is really nice to read your comments and it is after a very long time that I have seen sane remarks from our friends across the border. You have highlighted some issues in your comments. To that I would say that everyone has their own point of view and they have all the right to express it. My point of view on Kashmir and Bangladesh is different from yours ( then again, they are my views :)) However, I totally agree with you on the topic of Indian media. I have watched some of Indian talk shows and i was surprised to see that majority of the talk shows ( hosted by some eminent Indian anchorpersons ) focused on nothing but Pakistan-bashing. The Pakistani talk show on the other hand cover a wide -range of topics which includes India, poverty, relations with US, education, economy and so on. I agree with you 100% that ""In the end the only way forward for us is to live together peacefully and respectfully and the gusy on both sides who say that we should destroy the other are the elites who are already financially secure and commercial interests outside and won't be impacted by war" from Pakistani Queen
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ