Akhtar and Yousuf, what do you have to say about Lala's performance now?

Yousuf and Akhtar's analysis of Afridi reeks of personal vendetta. Such criticism is uncalled for.

Salman Zafar December 12, 2013
In the last couple of weeks, we have seen a lot of interest in Shahid Afridi. Not to say that he was shy of the media before, but his war of words with Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Yousuf has left a bad taste in the mouth for cricket lovers across the country.

What’s surprising is that the number of fingers pointed at Afridi outnumbered the ones pointed at Akhtar and Yousuf. Not only does that show the fickle nature of a Pakistani supporter, it also goes to show the level of hypocrisy prevailing in this country.

It was July 2013, not too long ago, when Afridi ended up with figures of seven wickets for 12 runs in the West Indies ODI series and every cricket fan in the country was swooning over how good he was. Fast forward a couple of months and the same fans are now cursing him.


Is it because he shot back at the three pseudo analysts appearing on our TV screen?

The first one is Akhtar, whose penchant for controversy overshadowed his ability throughout his career. Next up is Yousuf, who is still bitter about the way the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) treated him and is reaching Amir Sohail-esque levels of grudge bearing.

Last but not least, you have Sikander Bakht, whose contribution to Pakistan cricket is laughable. Criticising poor performances is fair and justifiable, but criticism coming from people who do not have a rational bone in their body, is infuriating.

For one, sitting in the comfort of your TV talk shows’ set is a very easy place to launch criticism. Afridi is right when he said,
“The way some of these experts behave and act is as if the team never lost in their time”

While losing is never easy and you eventually need to face the music, singling out one player is a shame. Afridi, for all the critique thrown at him, did a reasonably good job with the ball against South Africa. Yes, for the millionth time, he’s a specialist bowler, not a batsman. What he brings as a batsman is only a bonus. Nothing more and nothing less.

Our performance against South Africa in UAE, included players who deserved a much greater slack. Mohammad Hafeez for example, has been nothing short of woeful, of late.

Why don’t we see the pseudo cricket analysts on TV or talk shows when it comes to him?

What about Nasir Jamshed?

He’s been out of form for ages, or even the regularly careless, Umar Akmal?

No one has slammed them or called for their heads.

Afridi probably makes for a very easy target and opinions on him will always vary on the extreme. People will either adore him or detest him. It is true that he hasn’t been at his best recently but he has hardly been as bad as his performances are made out to be.

Any normal player would be infuriated when he has to face undue criticism. Even Misbahul Haq agreed with Afridi’s stance on matters, not explicitly perhaps, when it comes to the recent criticism towards the team. Floating around outlandish suggestions of retirement every time the team underperforms is ridiculous.

We have been watching, supporting and playing cricket for decades, yet we have never been able to measure our emotions with rational thinking. We will praise the same players to no bounds when they play well and call for their heads every time they come home with a loss.

Yousuf and Akhtar were fantastic players on the pitch but their analysis towards the team reeks of personal vendetta more than anything else. Having played cricket for so long, they themselves know the pressures of playing on a losing side and they know how hard it is to handle the pressure in a cricket-crazy nation that smells blood after every defeat.

Facing the fickle supporters and our vulturous press is already a hard task, the last thing the current players need is former players coming up and demanding retirements and sackings. This is the same team that lost resoundingly to South Africa in UAE and then turned the tables in the very next series with a series win.

Afridi may not be a legend but his contribution to our limited overs team has been significant. He was the man who led us to our best ODI World Cup outing in 12 years and played a major role in our first T20 World Cup triumph in 2009.

He has produced some very memorable performances with the ball during his career and has even managed to pull off the occasional blinder with the bat. He remains as the only player in ODI history who took a five wicket haul and scored 50 runs three times.

While his form has seen a dip lately compared to his heydays, he isn’t ready to give up anytime soon. In all probability, he is going to be around till the 2015 World Cup and will play an integral role in our ODI and T20 sides, a fact highlighted by his ‘Man of the Match’ performance versus Sri Lanka less than 24 hours ago.

Yesterday, all-rounder Afridi starred in Pakistan’s exciting three wicket win over Sri Lanka in the first Twenty20 International at Dubai stadium. In all, Afridi hit three sixes and two boundaries to help Pakistan overcome a tough challenge from world number one, Sri Lanka, who had taken the match to the final over with Pakistan needing six runs.

This is the same player who was being slammed left, right and centre, and the same player whose cricket obituary gets written at the end of every other series. The reaction towards his latest performance was typical of our cricket following public and the pseudo analysts – nothing but acclaim for Afridi. However, the very same people will start sharpening their knives should he have a dry spell in the next few matches, which is most ironic part. Heroes one day, villains the very next.

Good performances and poor performances are an everyday part of any sportsman. What we need to remember is that these are our players. If we don’t support them in tough times, no one else will.

Criticism is fine, but undue criticism is uncalled for.

[poll id="312"]
Salman Zafar The writer works in the Education Sector and tweets as @salmanzafar1985 (https://twitter.com/salmanzafar1985)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

Facebook Conversations


raj | 6 years ago | Reply | Recommend Once in a blue moon innings and he will play something good after 10 innings again. The point where the writer asked why umar akmal or nasir jamshed is not asked about their performances is that these new comers have not played 300 games. Afridi on the other hand is useless as he has enough experience to decide what he wants to do. Even i can play better shots than him. he should still be out of the team (may be not t20)
roughcheck | 6 years ago | Reply | Recommend By the way his economy in ODI is 4.61 runs/over in 365 ODIs with a bowling average of around 34. is this the fine bowling you mentioned? Whats the big deal if a man plays 350 matches and takes 345 wickets???? c'mon look what murali, shane warne, saeed, saqlain, have been doing in recent past with what average and what economy rates..... In addition, he is not only there bcz of his so called 'fine bowling' but bcz of his lobbing, specific fanship and media hype. and he was inducted as an all rounder by the way
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ