Pakistan in South Africa : A tale of missed opportunities so far

And as harsh as it sounds, I feel Tanvir, with his sub-par and docile bowling should not play Tests.

Rashid Latif February 21, 2013
The second Test at Newlands provided Pakistan with the perfect opportunity to square the series but we couldn’t capitalise on it.

However, these are make-or-break opportunities.

Younus Khan and Asad Shafiq gave Pakistan the perfect start with classy centuries and 338 was a decent enough total in the first innings. Saeed Ajmal backed them with a six-wicket haul and Pakistan could have taken a big lead of 100 runs or more but the quicks disappointed and the lead evaporated.

I think that is where Pakistan lost heart.

The situation demanded head coach Dav Whatmore to lift the morale of his players but if there was any input from his side, it did not reflect in Pakistan’s performance. I cannot make a stronger case for his removal as results have not improved during his reign.

Pakistan looked a very different side from the one that went out to bat in the first innings, getting out cheaply. Azhar Ali played the role of sheet anchor but his 65-run innings was too slow for my liking. He was way too defensive in his approach and he needs to work on this aspect of his batting.

The game of cricket has evolved and now the batting needs to extend as low down the order as possible. This is not to say that the lower order should make up for the failings of our openers or our middle order but they need to step up.

In this regard, wicketkeeper Sarfaraz Ahmed disappointed me a lot because he did not deliver when he was needed most by the team. It was a perfect situation for him to chip in with 30 or 40 and it could have proved significant.

The change of the ball in the 60th over was a key moment. The replacement ball swung and spun and Pakistan lasted barely an hour after this.

The eventual target of 182 was admittedly below par, but so was Misbahul Haq’s approach. He attacked from both ends which leaked runs. Ideally, he should have attacked from one end, with Ajmal and dried up runs from the other end.

It would still have been a gigantic task with our inexperienced pace battery led by Umar Gul who is in no way a spearhead and has disappointed for the last two seasons. And as harsh as it sounds, I feel Tanvir, with his sub-par and docile bowling should not play Tests.

I don’t see the Pakistan team managing a win or even a draw in the third Test. We only have three dependable batsmen in Asad, Younus and Misbah with no support from others. Openers Muhammad Hafeez and Nasir Jamshed have yet to make any contribution. The pair is only good for ODIs and T20s Imran Farhat should replace Jamshed.

The biggest plus so far for Pakistan in the tour has been the class shown by Asad Shafiq and I think he has the quality of becoming a great batsman like Hanif Muhammad, Inzamamul Haq and Mohammad Yousuf.

Follow Rashid on Twitter @Rlateeef 
WRITTEN BY:
Rashid Latif Rashid Latif is a former captain of the Pakistan cricket team.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (12)

Fahad Raza | 8 years ago | Reply Imran farhat made the best score against the South Africans way back in the last decade, which is his higest. Now he played his last test in 2010 vs England lords that went bad. he did not perform. So a man sitting out for 2 years from test should we expect him to perform in a long day session. We would be naive. His odi are no well as well even if he made 50 in july las ye but that was dubai.. not the seaming pitches of South Africa. We need to lookout for the replacement of Afridi as well.. Nice to see a a blog from the Former keeper. Cheers
Noman Ansari | 8 years ago | Reply @Bilal: I can't believe he called Salim Malik a good captain. After all, Rashid Latif and Basit Ali are the guys who exposed match fixers.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ