Bring back tourism to G-B

A few years ago, G-B would host so many foreign tourists that domestic tourists found it hard to find accommodation.

Peer Muhammad January 10, 2013
I still remember how tourists, particularly foreigners, would openly wander around the streets of Gilgit-Baltistan before the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent start of sectarian violence in the region.

G-B is one of the world’s most scenic destinations, where tourism was once the main source of income for a majority of the population.

During summer, some 12 years ago, G-B would host so many foreign tourists that domestic tourists found it hard to find any accommodation.

Every hotel, restaurant, guesthouse and even private residents were occupied by foreign tourists and dollars were showered in every business.  Tourists would roam around without any guards and there was no fear of attacks on them. But, alas, the golden period is over and the region has been hit by a wave of sectarianism.

The tourism industry in G-B has almost vanished and the economic situation of people has started depleting as there is no other business due to the landlocked location of the region and not to forget, its harsh weather.

The hotel industry, transport sector, cottage industry and small businesses have also lost their prime customers and G-B was rapidly embracing economic difficulties.

Why should it not be the prime responsibility of the government to craft a comprehensive strategy to attract foreign tourists and once again to the key tourist spots of Pakistan and restore G-B back to its former glory?

The government should ensure foolproof security to tourists along with providing basic facilities so that they can comfortably visit one of the most scenic tourist spots of the world.

Read more by Peer Muhammad here.
Peer Muhammad
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ