Don't throw acid on the face of Islam!

Saying acid attacks are unique to the Muslim world is like saying rape, revenge and men are unique to the Muslim world

Faheem Younus September 12, 2012
I bet you didn't know these two recent stories:

A 49-year old female in New York suffered burns on more than 50 percent of her body because her father poured acid on her face and body.

A 29-year-old female in Montreal suffered burns on more than 70 percent of her body.


Her boyfriend doused acid on her face during a fit of anger, literally melting her skin away.

You didn't know these stories because acid attacks are pigeonholed as a ‘Muslim problem’. And in these cases, neither the victims, nor the assailants, were Muslims. It is suggested that 99.9 percent of such attacks occur in the Muslim culture.

Check out the news about the above victim in New York. It ends with a link to an Afghan acid attack story. Talk about being suggestive.

That suggestion, however, is flat out wrong.

More than 80 percent of all acid attacks are committed against women. Granted, in some cases women have also committed these crimes against men and/or other women, but a majority of them were retaliatory. Therefore, men are the common denominator -- not Islam.

WHO report remarked;
“Apart from Bangladesh, acid violence has been reported in Afghanistan, Cambodia, China, India, Jamaica, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Africa and Uganda. There have also been a few isolated cases in Europe and North America.”

“Acid violence is a worldwide phenomenon”, said the Acid Survivor Trust International, the largest European organisation helping the victims of acid attacks, ‘that is not restricted to a particular race, religion or geographical location’. According to estimates, more than 1,500 people in 20 countries are victims of acid attacks every year.

Sorry guys, but saying that acid attacks are unique to the Muslim world is like saying that rage, rape, revenge, resentment is -- and men are -- unique to the Muslim world.

It doesn't work that way.

Some jokingly insist;
“American men probably got the idea from the Muslims.”

That's a bad joke for two reasons. It's insensitive and inaccurate.

According to the New York Times, a Brooklyn man threw acid on his ‘exceedingly good looking’ landlady's face in the 1890s.

The truth is that almost no sizable race, religion, country or custom is immune from this vile crime.

Take Colombia for instance. A South American Spanish speaking country, that recently reported up to 100 acid attacks a year. The country's population is 95 percent Christian and less than 1 percent Muslim.

So would you blame the Christians or the Spanish culture?

Consider Cambodia. Located close to Vietnam, it reported approximately 100 acid attacks over a two year period. More than 95 percent of the country practices Buddhism with less than two percent Muslims. So much for nirvana, a state of ultimate peace, I guess.

Or look at India. While actual numbers are much higher, a Cornell University study asserts that there were 153 acid attacks reported just in the Indian media from 1999 to 2010. The country is 80 percent Hindu, 13 percent Muslim and two percent Sikh (who are also not immune to such attacks).

Many cases have been reported from Hong Kong and China. Even in Israel, a small country, a teacher and two students were burned when a Jewish family decided to bring the feud to school by throwing acid on their faces.

Count it all and you end up with approximately five billion people, adherents of five of the world's largest religions, spanning over five continents.

Yes, the rate of acid attacks remains higher in the Muslim majority countries but that's true for the rates of polio, illiteracy, poverty and corruption too, suggesting an alternate hypothesis.

That hypothesis, according to psychologists, is the despicable desire to inflict permanent disfigurement, not death, upon the victim. And the feelings of rage, revenge, resentment in the background of self-righteousness, poverty, illiteracy and false pride are largely responsible for such desires.

Let's see if this hypothesis resonates with our minds.

Rage caused permanent blindness for Victor Riesel, a famous journalist, when a gangster threw acid at him in New York City in 1956.

Perhaps the paradigm of rage-revenge was at play when women in ArizonaCleveland and Chicago suffered similar attacks in recent years.

We don't know if it was resentment or an attempt to gain sympathy when a woman in Washington State was caught in a self inflicted acid attack.

And the vitriolic self righteousness -- which has already burned people at the abortion clinics in the states of Texas, Louisiana and Florida during 1998 -- continues to threaten similar clinics in England.

Thankfully, the perpetrators are not getting a free ride anymore -- even in Muslim countries. Since Bangladesh introduced the death penalty for throwing acid in 2002, according to Morrison and Rahman, acid attacks have dropped from an estimated 500 in 2002 to fewer than 100 in 2010.

In Iran, acid attacks are now considered a capital offense. The Oscar winning documentary ‘Saving Face’ has exposed these heinous crimes in Pakistan where acid attack are now punishable with life imprisonment.

Muslim men should realise that staying indifferent to these crimes happening in Muslim countries is like allowing someone to douse sulphuric acid on Islam's face.

And all men could help by raising awareness about these crimes and demanding stricter legislation, instead of blaming Islam.

[poll id="206"]

This post originally appeared here.

Read more by Faheem here, or follow him on Twitter @FaheemYounus

Join us on Facebook for blog updates and more! 
Faheem Younus The writer is clinical associate professor at University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA. The author can be followed @Faheem!/FaheemYounus
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.


Faaltu mein khwam kha | 11 years ago | Reply @Vikram I was referring to author's previous blogs where he complained about the heinous treatment,his community (Ahmadis) is being meted out in Pakistan.when he goes to the town with his story of persecution by state and people of Pakistan,is he himself not portraying Muslims in a bad light?is he not stereotyping Pakistanis?His stories of anti Ahmadi acts by Pakistan,only take her image for a here he comes with this new story to be good in hardliner's books.i think he is batting both ways. sheer hypocrisy..
gp65 | 11 years ago | Reply "there were 153 acid attacks reported just in the Indian media from 1999 to 2010. The country is 80 percent Hindu, 13 percent Muslim and two percent Sikh (who are also not immune to such attacks)." So there were were around 14 reported acid attacks in India per year. What is the comparable number for Pakistan/Bangladesh/Afghanistan? You have not provided it. You have also not given a break-up of the 153 cases in 11 years. The fact that the country is 80% Hindu and 13% Muslim does not prove anything. BEcause even at 13%, India has 160 million Muslims. Now it is possible that all 14 attacks a year were associated with Muslim guys. Or all of them could have been associated with Hindu guys. I do not know. But it looks like you do not either. So the information you provided does not prove the point you are trying to make. In any event, as one of the other posters has said, focus on helping the people who are suffering in your country if you can instead of justifying the situation by saying it occurs elsewhere also. The last time the police officer gave me a ticket for speeding - I did not tell him oh others were speeding too. And If I had said that, he would not have listened to me.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ