Israeli persecution: History's ironic repetition

Is what the Nazi’s did to the Jews of Germany different from what the Zionists are doing to the Muslims of Palestine?

Aneka Chohan August 11, 2012
A young man – a Palestinian national footballer – lay on a bed in hospital. His weak face partially hidden with an oxygen mask while the machine continues to beep every second, matching the thumping of this heart beat; zigzag lines on the screen drawing each second of life left within him. He is critically ill and fighting for his life.

His diagnosis?

A serious illness caused due to a prolonged hunger strike.

Why was this hunger strike more important than his own health, you ask.

The hunger strike was carried out as a form of protest against his detention at the brutal hands of Israel.

It had been three months - since March 24, 2012 - that Mahmoud Sarsak had been refusing food. The 25-year-old was one of more than 2,000 Palestinians held captive in Israeli jails demanding that Israel ends its abusive use of administrative detention – detention without charge or trial.

When we read through our history books, one country or the other has at least one fact to be proud of. Ever since the State of Israel came into existence, it is hard to think of one good thing the nation has to be proud of, depending on what the nation defines as pride.

Keeping people in prisons without basic rights or even without the right to be freed – either by bail or charge – is one of the most barbaric ways to behave. It just goes to show how low the Zionists are willing to go to silence the Palestinians.

As the clock ticks, bulldozers continue to demolish Palestinian homes. They roam freely and illegally across their lands, building settlements along the way. Powerful leaders, of the Western and Arab world, silently watch the cruelty unfold against these people. The Palestinians still protest for their rights – their right to live in their own country without the fear of oppression or persecution – and as soon as the word of achieving freedom passes through their lips, they are silenced by being concealed from the world.

The right to speak up, protest and fight for freedom is something that is a basic to all humans. To take away such rights is not only inhumane but is against International Law as well. It just goes to show what animals the Israelis have become.

It is quite ironic actually.

Wasn’t it the Jewish community that was robbed of basic rights back in the early 1940s in Nazi Germany?

They were robbed of their own identity when they were forced to wear the stars, identifying their Jewish faith. They were also robbed of their right to life, were they not? Freedom of speech was a privilege they did not have nor could they protest the atrocities that took place in the concentration camps.

Rather than learning from that horrific experience, they chose to repeat it with another nation. Consumed by the hatred they felt and the pain and suffering, they ended up becoming something they once hated and despised themselves.

How is what the Nazi’s did to the Jews of Germany any different from what the Zionists are now doing to the Muslims of Palestine?

The plight of these Palestinians protesting against the mighty Israel may go unnoticed now, but it is for us to remember and for them to never  forget that even the smallest person can change the course of history.

Didn’t David – a young boy – defeat Goliath, a huge giant?

Read more by Aneka here or follow her on Twitter @anekachohan
WRITTEN BY:
Aneka Chohan The author is a freelance journalist and human rights activist. She tweets as @anekachohan (https://twitter.com/anekachohan)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (18)

John B | 12 years ago | Reply I think the author never visited Israel and travelled to Palestine and making up article from what she hears from news. The Palestine stalemate is about money for the new Palestine state, citizenship status of Palestine diaspora living in Arab states, and security (level of army), revenue sharing from taxation, access to and from Gaza and West Bank, (west Pakistan -east Pakistan story) and access to sea ports and type of government in Gaza and W.Bank. And the thorny issue of Jerusalem. None of which can be solved by US alone. Like Pakistan has allies, Israel has allies in US and Palestine is not shunned by US, and solution to Palestine is US responsibility. The two state solution which is becoming a reality is an alternative US solution. The issue here is how to do it with the issues described above. Yes, Israel sometimes use draconian measures and so do Palestine factions. The issues are nearly similar to Baluchistan in PAK context. The settlements are simple issues. Unlike the author's view, common Palestinians work and earn in Israel and taxation collected in Israel is shared with palestine as well. The Hamas led faction is a stumbling block for years to come. Iran and Syria are in the way. State of Palestine becomes closer to reality, if Iran changes its position and arab countries grant citizenship to Palestine diaspora. If welfare of Muslims (Palestinians) and Jewish (Israeli) people is the real concern, the better solution is a federation than a two state solution. US tried for years on that front and failed due to various local politics of the region and now we are in two state solution negotiation. Personally, I doubt that two sate solution will succeed. Too many issues. I believe in the federation solution, a workable and manageable solution to both parties. All the above said issues disappear in a federation. The good thing happened to that region since founding of Israel is large patch of waste land became productive by scientific management. Comparing Palestinian issue with holocaust is a cheap shot. Palestine has a strong UN lobby than PAK and Israel and it is rightfully so.
Johhny Ross | 12 years ago | Reply Nice work, Thanks
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ