Russia calls the shots

The Russians have long had a close relationship with President Assad, who they view as a strategic asset


Editorial October 03, 2015
Russia's President Vladimir Putin addresses the 70th session of the United Nations General Assembly September 28, 2015 at the United Nations in New York. AFP PHOTO

What started as a protest against the Assad regime is now a bloody civil war that gains facets anew each passing day. Syria is being ripped apart, an estimated 50 per cent of the entire population are either refugees from war or internally displaced. President Bashar al-Assad remains in power and into the fray has come the Islamic State (IS), and now the Russians. The Americans are running an air campaign along with Britain, France, Germany, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Russia has its own coalition with Iran and Iraq — and the Assad regime — and is making some not-so-subtle changes to the Middle East playbook along the way.

Russia’s commitment of very substantial air assets, its ground support units and the possibility of ground troops if Vladimir Putin is so minded, has within a matter of a week altered the landscape of the Syrian conflict. Russia makes none of the differentiation that the US-led coalition makes when it comes to target selection. For the Russians, as was baldly stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at a press conference on October 2, “A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist.” In this instance, that may include groups that are opposed to the Assad regime and have had American support and training in the recent past. President Barack Obama was equally clear that Russian failing to distinguish between IS fighters and more moderate opposition forces fighting Assad was a “recipe for disaster”.

By any standard, the Syrian war is messy, both literally and metaphorically. It is sectarian, tribal, ideological and territorial. Prior to hostilities commencing, the conflict had been latent for decades, the country held together by successive repressive regimes, latterly in the hands of the Assad family and their clans-people. The Old Colonial powers remained influential, with Britain and France busy behind the scenes. The conflict could have gone on for bloody years but for the rise and rise of the IS, which has forced assorted hands. The Russians have long had a close relationship with President Assad, who they view as a strategic asset. Syrian ports welcome the Russian Navy.

President Obama got it wrong when he said that “This is not some superpower chessboard contest” — because it is, and Russia currently enjoys the run of the game. It dictated the agenda when President Putin met with the leaders of France and Germany on October 2. The meeting was supposed to discuss the situation in Ukraine. However, Ukraine was sidelined and Syria was on the table. All sides were tightlipped when the meeting broke up.

The Russian air strikes are the first outside the boundaries of the former Soviet Union since the invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The air strikes by the American coalition have not proved to be decisive in curbing the IS, and one must question whether the Russians are going to be able to do via airpower what others have failed to do. The potential for military misadventures with several air forces active in Syrian airspace is significant. Civilian casualties are going to rise and the propaganda machines of all sides in the conflict are already working overtime to spin their perspective on the battles on the ground and the strikes from the air. There is no talk of a peace conference that carries any credibility and the war is destined to continue unabated.

For the IS, the Russian action in the short term will make little difference. It continues to hold and administer large tracts in Syria and Iraq, and continues to attract thousands of ‘foreign fighters’ from around the world who are eager and willing to fight under its flag for whatever reason. There does not appear to be a military solution as the game is close to stalemated on the ground. Other players wait in the wings, Iran prominent among them. The war in Syria is emerging as the defining conflict of modern times, and Russia is now shaping that conflict.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (3)

cautious | 8 years ago | Reply Editor makes a common mistake equating American ambivalence with Russian power. USA no longer needs ME oil and it's strategic goals in ME have evolved. American's seem to understand that the conflict in the region boils down to a religious power struggle that isn't going to be resolved by American intervention - a refreshing change. . Putin intervention is an unknown. If he targets ISIS it's a win/win. If he only targets the moderate opposition (which appears to be likely) then he's going to upset Europeans and Turkey who are bearing the brunt of the war refugees ... that anger is only going to help the USA maintain economic sanctions on Russia which has less than three years of hard currency left. All things said I suspect Obama views the current situation just fine.
Feroz | 8 years ago | Reply On one side is lined up an alliance of Syria/Russia/Iran/China and on the other side USA/Israel/Saudi Arabia/Qatar. Turkey of course the joker in the pack taking money and resources to attack ISIS but using them to attack their foes the Kurds. Turkey also has facilitated all foreign fighters going to assist ISIS, allowing passage through its territory. Not just that but Turkey is buying Oil from the ISIS gangsters in Iraq, thereby bankrolling them. A lethal cocktail indeed. Very likely Russia provides the Air Power and Iran will put boots on the ground. If well coordinated they can clear Syria of all foreign fighters within a month. There is now real panic spreading from US to Israel to Saudi Arabia. A foothold in the Middle East is a position no one wants to surrender.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ