In pursuit of free and fair elections

Reform committee has suggested amending the Constitution to replace the ECP leadership with retired civil servants


Editorial August 30, 2015
A file photo of ballot boxes. PHOTO: REUTERS

Three separate election tribunals have recently unseated three PML-N legislators, citing incompetence of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and flaws such as votes being cast without valid CNICs or the existence of a substantial number of unverifiable votes, among other factors. In all these three contests, the defeated candidates had belonged to the PTI. The judicial commission that had looked into the complaints of the PTI, while rejecting the party’s charges of systematic rigging, had also found that the performance of the ECP in conducting the 2013 general elections left much to be desired. This calls for an in-depth discussion on how best to improve the ECP’s performance if future elections are to be saved from being doubted and questioned.



A number of studies conducted by independent think tanks have concluded that no election held since 1977 was free from the stigma of rigging. Most were manipulated by the deep state in order to bring in governments willing to serve its agenda formulated in a particular strategic environment of a given period. So, all these years the civil administration that had manned the ECP and its judicial leadership never had the chance to build their respective capacities for the job. In fact, for its own reasons, the state would manoeuvre only those persons into these jobs who would take orders without question and who would go home on retirement without having any knowledge of what had happened during elections held under their watch.

This means that today we have mostly clerical-minded officers manning the ECP as well as compromised judicial officers leading it. The foremost task facing the government currently, therefore, is to reform the ECP’s administration in such a way so as to build the capacity of the permanent manpower of the Commission, and if possible to create a separate cadre for the purpose, or at least enable the Commission to have enough trained personnel on its permanent staff to be able to post one ECP officer at each polling station, to oversee the conduct of the temporary staff on election day.

A 33-member electoral reforms committee of parliament was constituted on July 25, 2014 to evaluate the shortcomings of the previous electoral process and make recommendations to enable the holding of free, fair and transparent elections. The committee is being chaired by Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, while Zahid Hamid heads the sub-committee assigned to review existing electoral laws and over 1,200 proposals received from various quarters in this regard. The sub-committee is said to be looking into proposals regarding introduction of latest technology for casting votes (use of electronic voting machines and biometric verification), the criteria for scrutinising the nomination papers of candidates (under Articles 62-63), voting rights for overseas Pakistanis and other matters.

Acting on the recommendation of the committee that the ECP undertake a pilot project regarding the use of latest technology in elections, the biometric verification system was tested on an experimental basis in the NA-19 (Haripur) by-election. It was found to be inadequate, not because of the system, but due to non-availability of fingerprints in the NADRA database, as well as invalid CNICs, blocked CNICs and calloused fingers that were not recognised by the system. The poll body report has recommended that the multiple pilot projects using biometrics should be continued in different by-elections until the achievement of a successful rate, where no legitimate voter would be deprived of getting authenticated because of any technical or operational reason. One of the proposals under consideration of the reform committee has also suggested amending the Constitution to replace the ECP leadership with retired civil servants of good reputation because judges are trained to sit in judgment after a crime has been committed. They are not trained to prevent a crime. This is what a civil servant is trained to do, especially while administrating a public function. This is a proposal that should indeed be given serious consideration.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 31st,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (1)

S.R.H. Hashmi | 8 years ago | Reply The 33-member electoral reforms committee of parliament is chaired by Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, while a sub-committee headed by Zahaid Hamid has been assigned the job of reviewing existing electoral laws, in connection with which 1,200 proposals have been received from various quarters. The sub-committee is said to be looking into proposals regarding introduction of latest technology for casting votes (use of electronic voting machines and biometric verification), the criteria for scrutinising the nomination papers of candidates (under Articles 62-63), voting rights of overseas Pakistanis and other matters. However, since conflict of interests will be involved, not all aspects of the reform can be left with the parliamentary committee. Very many of the present and usual parliamentarians who have been sneaking into the parliament by employing dubious means would hardly be willing to see their own entry into the Parliament barred. One obvious case is that of the scrutiny of the nomination papers of candidates under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution. By taking advantage of various weaknesses in the system, loan defaulters and other people with much more than tainted past have been habitually barging into the Parliament and have managed to grab the top posts much to the misfortune of the country and the nation. It is therefore of utmost importance to get a very clear interpretation of Articles 62 and 63 and to develop these in a questionnaire form for easy and unbiased application by those entrusted with the job of scrutinizing the nomination papers. And to make it foolproof, the superior judiciary should also be involved in this as well as other aspects of the electoral reforms where the conflict of interest may prevent the parliamentarians from adopting the rightful course. Karachi
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ