Pakistan will likely use US weapons against Baloch insurgents, India: Haqqani

Former ambassador questions US govt's decision to sell almost $1 billion in US-made attack weapons to Pakistan


Web Desk April 20, 2015
Former Pakistan ambassador to US Husain Haqqani. PHOTO: AFP

Husain Haqqani, who has been living under self-imposed exiled in the US since 2012, believes the US government is committing a mistake by selling weapons to Pakistan as they will be used to “fight or menace” India.

In a scathing piece in the Wall Street Journal, the former ambassador to the US (2008-11) questioned the Obama administration’s recent decision to sell almost $1 billion in US-made attack helicopters, missiles to Pakistan. Interestingly, the headline of the article reads "Why are We Sending This Attack Helicopter to Pakistan?" Last time we checked, Haqqani was still a Pakistani citizen but things may have changed since then.

Read: US State Department approves Pakistan's request for arms worth $1b

Haqqani felt the weapons sale will fuel conflict in South Asia without fulfilling the objective of helping Pakistan fight terrorism. “Pakistan’s failure to tackle its jihadist challenge is not the result of a lack of arms but reflects an absence of will,” wrote Haqqani, arguing that the arms race with India remains to be the dominant force in Pakistan’s foreign and domestic policies.

The former ambassador has been residing in the US since 2012 after being accused of sending a memo to US Defense Department that asked for help in reining in the Pakistan military. “The US has fed Pakistan’s delusion of being India’s regional military equal. Seeking security against a much larger neighbor is a rational objective but seeking parity with it on a constant basis is not,” wrote Haqqani.

Read: Billion-dollar US arms sale to help Pakistan in counter-terrorism operations: FO spokesperson

He believed that US officials should convince Pakistan to give up its hopes of attempting to rival a country with a population six times as large and economy 10 times as big.

“It’s a mystery why the president suddenly trusts Pakistan’s military—after mistrusting it at the time of the Navy SEAL operation in May 2011 that found and killed Osama bin Laden living safely until then in the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad,” Haqqani wrote, while wondering if the US government is just simply lazy in its approach with Pakistan. “Selling helicopters and missiles is easier than thinking of alternative strategies to compel an errant ally to change its behavior."

The former ambassador believes the equipment to be provided by the US – 15 AH-1Z Viper helicopters and 1,000 Hellfire missiles – will be used against insurgents in Balochistan, bordering Iran, and along the disputed border in Kashmir rather than against militants in tribal areas.

Read: These are the countries exporting weapons to Pakistan and India

“If the Obama administration believes Pakistan’s military has really changed its priorities, it should consider leasing helicopters to Pakistan and verify where they are deployed before going through with outright sales,” the ambassador suggests.

COMMENTS (75)

Sadia Bhangash | 9 years ago | Reply A former political appointee Pakistani ambassador to the US has been resident in the US since 2012. He moved there after a court case investigated his possible connivance in a letter to the US asking them to make defanging the Pakistan military a condition for US support. At that time the term ‘trojan horse’ came to mind. Now this gentleman has given the terms ‘toady’ and ‘turncoat’ a whole new meaning. In an article in the Wall Street Journal dutifully picked by our media he questions the US government’s wisdom of selling helicopters and missiles to Pakistan and ‘advises’ the US against such a step. His reasoning is that Pakistan will use these weapon systems to ‘fight’ India and against the Baluch insurgents. In his enthusiasm to appeal to a certain segment in the US and to a larger audience in India the former ambassador forgets that Pakistan already has such weapon systems and is using them only in the Counter terror operation being executed by the Pakistan military with much success. He also forgets to state that Pakistan is fully aware of the asymmetry with India and has no desire to enter into an arms race to achieve parity. Pakistan’s full spectrum deterrence is designed to ward off the threat from India and not to ‘fight’ India –unless the former ambassador knows of Indian plans for aggression against Pakistan that lesser mortals are not aware of. Pakistan does not need such US supplied weapon systems to deal with the handful of externally sponsored ‘insurgents’ in Baluchistan. Pakistan is doing a good job of sidelining not only them but also the criminals in Karachi. The US is aware of this reality and it does not take decisions without fully considering the consequences. So they have taken absolutely the right decision and at the right time in terms of US interests. The former ambassador’s outburst will find resonance among others in the US who never lose an opportunity to do a hatchet job on Pakistan especially its military and intelligence apparatus. He will certainly be lauded in India where he visited recently specifically to bad mouth his country — much to the delight of his hosts. The trouble is that those making verbal attacks on Pakistan to please their masters have fitted themselves into a groove by saying the same old things again and again so one just has to read the name of the author to classify the article and discard it. As the townspeople told the Pied Piper of Hamelin—‘go on fellow do your worst, blow your pipe till you burst’ when they refused to pay for his services. One wonders if there is a profit motive behind such blatant unpatriotic utterances.
Atif | 9 years ago | Reply So, is there any anything WRONG in his statement. Back inside our mind we all know that this is TRUE.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ