UK equates asylum seekers with criminals?

Published: April 3, 2015
SHARES
Email
The writer is a vice-chairperson of a Glasgow-based human rights organisation

The writer is a vice-chairperson of a Glasgow-based human rights organisation

“They rob you of your dignity and treat you like criminals, and they can storm into your room without any caution or notice,” said a former detainee regarding the treatment that security guards mete out at the Yarl’s Wood Immigration and Removal Centre in Bedfordshire, UK. Having received refugee status in 2012 and now soon-to-be a proud law graduate this summer, the 34-year-old Pakistan-born looked back to the first time she entered the UK. Having applied for asylum at the airport, she was driven to Yarl’s Wood, which she described as a “prison cell”. “An asylum seeker is equal to a criminal in the UK,” she told me.

Her account of treatment at the hands of the security officials at the Yarl’s Wood Removal Centre echoes with the excruciating, unforgettable and unspeakable experiences of hundreds and thousands of those who went through similar trauma. The Yarl’s Wood Removal Centre is one of the largest detention facilities in the UK, which houses women facing deportation. At least 30,000 people are held in detention every year in the UK, with the Yarl’s Wood Centre regarded as one of the worst after years-long reports of abuse, hunger strikes and shocking healthcare access.

A report by the Women for Women Refugee last year highlighted that the detainees’ right to privacy is violated by security guards with regularity. Women detainees claimed that they are stared at by the male members of the staff all the time while using toilets. Last year, the United Nations Special Rapporteur, Rashida Manjoo, was denied access to the centre. She wanted to record an inquiry into the reports of violence against women at the centre.

The right to healthcare is a basic fundamental human right. However, detainees have widely reported that they have only limited access to this right. Last year, Christine Chase, a 40-year-old Jamaican woman, died of a heart attack at the facility as she was denied medical attention. She was provided with a Paracetamol to cure her heart disease, which sadly led to her death.

The most recent case of abuse of women was highlighted by a Channel 4 investigation, which unveiled various serious examples of inhuman and racial abuse at the hands of the officials. The UK’s Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Communities and Pensioners’ Right, Alex Neil, has acknowledged the abuse at the centre by saying that “it is unlawful for any public authority to act in a manner that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. The allegations made by Channel 4 raise serious concerns about the management and operation of the Yarl’s Wood Centre. It is also regrettable that the Home Office last year refused to allow the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women to visit the facility.”

Sarah Campbell, who works for a charity that helps detainees and prepares their applications for bail, told me that the recent cuts to funds that go towards providing legal aid to detainees in the UK have further compounded problems for them. She said: “In this context, it is perhaps unsurprising that detention centre staff have felt able to maltreat detainees with impunity. They may correctly assume that these people will soon be bungled onto a plane, with few questions asked about why they were detained or how they were treated.”

Another factor which contributes to the trauma of the detainees is to ‘live a life on hold’ due to the current asylum system which has an indefinite period of detention. The Labour Party has promised to introduce a time limit on the detention period if it comes to power. The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, told The Guardian that the current system is inefficient and “deeply scarring” for those trapped in asylum detention centres such as Yarl’s Wood. Rights groups claim that Britain should introduce a time frame for thousands of detainees trapped in indefinite periods of detention.

Britain, being a signatory to the UN Convention on Refugees, has failed to keep its standards. Those fleeing persecution, instead of finding a safe haven, are conversely subjected to both physical and psychological scars, which leave lasting impressions on the detainees. Detaining people with no time limit is a cruel and unjust part of the British immigration and asylum system. It has already claimed many lives. Change is long overdue.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 4th, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (7)

  • Angus McKay
    Apr 4, 2015 - 4:54AM

    Perhaps the author could inform of details of the asylum claim put forward by the 34-year-old Pakistan-born and why she chose the UK to be her host country to flee to? Recommend

  • Parvez
    Apr 4, 2015 - 12:04PM

    Agree the British asylum system is flawed…… the name Altaf Hussain comes quickly to mind.Recommend

  • observer
    Apr 4, 2015 - 12:24PM

    99.99% of these asylum seekers are bogus people. They are violating the host nations’ laws. They deserve no sympathy.Recommend

  • Ali S
    Apr 4, 2015 - 1:57PM

    “They rob you of your dignity and treat you like criminals” – look at where you come from, you have no dignity to begin with (Pakistanis in general have a very inflated sense of self-worth and ghairat) and they have every right to suspect you of being a criminal considering your peers (if in doubt, just ask Altaf bhai). Cooperate, be humble and thankful that a first world country is accepting you as a guest and giving you the chance to be its citizen in time of need.Recommend

  • Sharjeel
    Apr 4, 2015 - 3:26PM

    My friend you should know it is the favorite Pakistani trick to claim to be a persecuted in order to get asylum. Honestly there are too migrants in the UK and I think the British have long past the limits of tolerance.Recommend

  • Omar J., Karachi
    Apr 5, 2015 - 2:59PM

    It is fraudulent to claim that asylum seekers are being indefinitely detained like criminals. Asylum seekers voluntarily choose to surrender their freedom in order to gain UK citizenship. They are free to leave the UK any time, and return to their country of origin. The fact that they choose not to do so obviously suggests that they see profit in the detention.Recommend

  • Naresh
    Apr 5, 2015 - 5:17PM

    Asylum Seekers : One cannot understand why Muslim Asylum seekers always seek Asylum in Non-Muslim Countries. Why is it that Muslim Asylum Seekers cannot get Asylum in Other Muslims Countries?
    .
    CheersRecommend

More in Opinion