There is no detail as to what exactly constitutes ‘objectionable’ or ‘unwanted’ or who decides what is to be blocked, much as there is complete obfuscation as to the processes associated with blocking websites on the internet. It appears that the discussions between the government, Suparco and lawmakers are already far advanced, and are being trailed by the government as just another part of the National Action Plan (NAP) and aimed at limiting sectarian material or ‘hate speech’ — including that of politicians. Once again the fig-leaf of ‘the national interest’ is being used to cover the advance of yet more limitations to freedom of speech and debate. We in no way condone — indeed vigorously condemn — the spreading of sectarian or hate material, and support an ethical position regarding the reporting of terrorist acts; but smuggling in another layer of censorship without transparency or checks and balances smacks of an uncomfortable totalitarianism. And that is cause for concern.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 27th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ