Who will transform Pakistan?

Public action, with people standing up in organised fashion, asking questions can force change in behaviour of elite


Rasul Bakhsh Rais January 20, 2015
The writer is a professor of political science at the Lahore University of Management Sciences

Things, as usual, will not work in Pakistan. The country is facing multiple challenges, from millions of children being out of school to terrorists massacring children in schools. The sad reality is Pakistan has neither achieved stability and security nor an optimal level of development — things that are usually seen to be at opposite ends because of their competing demands on national resources. In between, we have seen many other problems emerging in society, worst of which is extremism and religious intolerance. The system — power arrangements and institutional mechanisms that exist today — is not capable of transforming Pakistan and moving the country forward, or even backward, to the peaceful and much more stable country it used to be. The irony, however, is that transformation will have to come through the system and by the system. Neither the Constitution nor the political order it has established can be wished away or once again tossed into the dustbin. Its two replacement orders — direct military rule and a military-driven hybrid democracy with a subordinate elite have not worked. Rather, destabilisation of the system has created social and structural problems that continue to complicate Pakistan’s recovery from the mess.

The political history of Pakistan for the past three decades is a history of repeated disappointments. No matter which party, leader or institution was in control of the state apparatus, it has not made any difference. The rot continued by different means, in different directions, and with more disastrous consequences. Having witnessed Pakistan’s descent into confused conditions for several decades, and the country making a nosedive into decline during the past 10 years, trust and confidence in the current ruling groups is weaker than ever before. The transition from the military-dominated hybrid order now in its seventh year is still a transition at best. The hope that democracy and ‘democrats’ will consolidate democracy in the true sense has begun to fade.



Democratic transition and consolidation are not well-understood in a social climate framed by centuries’old authoritarian rule in this part of the world. Such a transition has never meant the personal consolidation of the ruling elite when they obtain popular mandate to rule through elections or procedural democracy. Nor does it imply the lifting of the threat to their rule when they decide to plunder the country left, right and centre and make institutions deliberately dysfunctional to milk all the benefits they want. The same elite joined the military club, and the club managers were very pleased to have them all in, if they wished to abide by the rules of the club. That is not the alternative anymore. Nor was it ever because that prevented natural social forces to emerge on their own in the country and force the ruling elite to do some good for society.

Pakistan will have to play with the same cards: the ruling elite, their parties and their puppets. How, then, can we force a change? It is possible only through public action. The public at large is always a dormant force in every society; it has to be awakened. Who can or will awaken it? The history of the world is replete with examples of when extraordinary circumstances produced great social movements. Pakistan is at the cusp of it with a thriving but frustrated middle class, free media and an activist civil society.

Public action, with people standing up in an organised fashion and asking questions, demanding answers and forcing change in the behaviour of the elite, is the only way out.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (10)

Dipak | 9 years ago | Reply

Dipak@Fazal Dad: I write a lot after knowing a lot about Pakistan. To some, it may sound like I am an enemy of Pakistan, but no I am a friend of Pakistan who gets frustrated when neither politician nor Army respond to average people of Pakistan. You can't just take solace by saying, well the Feudal, Military and Mullah are here to stay and do what they want to without input from average people. Feudal want to make millions and billions. Military people want to make millions and billions to make their lives luxurious. Mullah want to preach hate instead of real religion of piece, to make easy money. It's always the ordinary people to loose and overwork for their survival to please those three communities. That is my view of Pakistan as my Pakistani friends describe Pakistani to me.

vinsin | 9 years ago | Reply

@Sid: Pakistan was created because 86.6% Indian Muslims (not Kashmiri) voted for it in 1946 election. But when the elite Muslims moved to Pakistan they signed Liaquat Nehru Pact. Enmity started with internationalization of Kashmir issue by India/Nehru. It was India/Menon who declared that india has only one enemy that is Pakistan, when Pakistan said it would support India in war with china. Liaquat did everything that Jinnah asked him not to do, rest is history.

@Zia-ur-Rehman: It can also lead to anarchy.

@John B: That is because Pakistan doesn't have one voice. People are confused about the direction.After being cheated so many times they are not sure anymore what they want and how they want?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ