US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Ambassador Danial F Feldman believes India’s growing role in world affairs is tied to normalisation of its ties with Pakistan. “I’m convinced that India’s rise [in world affairs] cannot be realised without normalisation of Pakistan-India ties,” Feldman said during an interaction with Pakistani media persons at the US Embassy in Islamabad on Tuesday.
Engaged in this region’s affairs since 2009, Feldman served first as deputy and then as special deputy to Ambassadors Richard Holbrooke, Marc Grossman, and James Dobbins before assuming the role of special envoy on August 1 this year.
During his two-day tour to Pakistan, he will be meeting civilian and military leadership of Pakistan. He is scheduled to leave for Beijing on October 30 for a two-day visit to China.
He had meetings with Adviser to Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz, army chief General Raheel Sharif and others before his interaction with the media later in the afternoon.
Feldman said the United States was concerned over increasing border tensions between the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours. However, he said, his country’s policy vis-à-vis Kashmir remained the same: Pakistan and India should engage in dialogue to resolve their contentious issues.
According to Feldman, there is a ‘remarkable’ opportunity for regional stability after the new unity government has replaced the Hamid Karzai regime in Kabul. The new Afghan administration wants to start a new chapter in Pak-Afghan relations, he said, adding that he felt similar sentiments on Pakistani side during his interaction with Pakistani officials. “I hope that all stakeholders will avail this opportunity,” he said.
In reply to queries airing apprehension of a possible chaos in Afghanistan once the US completed troop pullout by end of the year, the US envoy made it clear that Washington was not going to leave Afghanistan and would only stop its combat operations.
“It is a misconception that we will not be there. We will be there in significant numbers. The combat operations will stop. International community’s assistance and commitment will continue for a long term in Afghanistan” he said.
He said the US would remain engaged in the region for a longer term because this was in its own security interest.
The visiting US envoy was not sure about the future of the Coalition Support Fund – the reimbursements of around $1 billion Pakistan has been getting for the past many years on account of its expenses in fighting war against militants mainly on its western border regions.
He was also unsure about any possible future extension of civilian assistance to Pakistan under the Kerry-Lugar-Berman bill which has expired this month. The two sides dispute over real disbursements under this programme under which Pakistan claims that it was to get $1.5 billion every year for five years but actually it received less than $5 billion so far.
“We will continue to have greater linkages on economic side and security side. I don’t see our commitment will diminish. Maybe it will be from assistance based to economic ties,” he said, while explaining the difficulties in getting approval of assistance programmes disbursements from US legislature.
No terrorists’ haven on either side
To a question about Pakistan and Afghanistan’s cross allegations of terrorist safe havens, he said there is a need for the two countries to engage more in dialogue at political, military and intelligence levels. He said the US believes there should not be any safe havens on either side. “There is a need for sustained dialogue,” he added.
Talks with Taliban
Feldman claimed that the US had no direct interaction with the Afghan Taliban since its last aborted attempt of reconciliation ended in March 2012. “We have had no meeting with the Taliban since March 2012,” he said, adding that if the US could assist in any reconciliation it will help new Afghan administration. “Otherwise, the unity government can adopt its own mechanism,” he added.
No support for unconstitutional move
On issue of Pakistan’s internal political situation and its likely impact on Pakistan-US ties, he said his country supports dialogue between all stakeholders. “However, it will oppose anything extra-constitutional in the country, which has a history of periodic military takeovers,” he added.
Meeting with General Raheel
According to the military’s media wing – Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) – which issued a short statement after ambassador Feldman’s meeting with army chief General Raheel Sharif, the overall regional security situation, particularly situation in Afghanistan, came under discussion.
Ambassador Feldman said Washington was looking forward to General Raheel’s maiden visit to the US as army chief early next month.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 29th, 2014.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
India and Pakistan can work for the normalization but due to lack of arms control culture in South Asia there are less implications of arms control. Pakistan insisted on various forums to make South Asia nuke free zone. When India tested nuclear weapon, Pakistan brought the proposal before United Nations. In 29th session of UNGA, Pakistan submitted a resolution that sought to declare in principle the concept of a nuclear weapon-free zone in South Asia. To prevent South Asia from a nuclear arm race, Pakistan offered various proposals to India. In 1978 Pakistan proposed to India a joint Indo-Pakistan declaration renouncing the acquisition and manufacture of nuclear weapons. During very next year, Pakistan proposed to India mutual inspections by India and Pakistan of nuclear facilities. Unfortunately, India refused all proposals.
@Natasha: Just because Pakistan keeps threatening a nuclear war if India responds to its agrgression robustly, it does not mean ghe world believes that will happen. Why?
India has a no first use policy on nuclear weapons, so it would never be the one to start a nuclear conflagration. Now a Pak general who authorises use of nuclear weapons against India knows perfectly well that when India responds, Pakistan will be wiped out. Since they are not suicidal, they will also never pull the nuclear trigger.
Modi government has called Pakistan's bluff on the nuclear blackmail.
The only way to have pece is for Pakistan to not violate ceasefire agreement of 2003
@fahim: Since it's easier to continue peddling the false narratives that have been constructed over the years. It requires major effort to chart a new course. We Indians sincerely believe that you Pakistanis deserve better leadership than the one your establishment is dishing out to you. I hope Pakistan gets a leadership that cares for its people first rather than some manufactured ideology.
India makes headlines and gain much fame by raising its forces against a nuclear weapon state Pakistan. This is not the first time that world stuck with fear of nuclear exchange in South Asia. India is famous for its hegemonic influence on smaller neighboring states of the region. There is a clear asymmetry between India and Pakistan on conventional level but this imbalance is timely countered by nuclear weapons of Pakistan. India wants to be famous on world stage through aggression but its ruthless attitude makes its own nationals to suffer. It is a country which solely covers 41% of global hunger of the world.
" “I’m convinced that India’s rise [in world affairs] cannot be realised without normalisation of Pakistan-India ties,” Feldman said during an interaction with Pakistani media persons at the US Embassy in Islamabad on Tuesday."
Sorry India's growth and prosperity is NOT linked to endlessly being bullied by Pakistan. India will respond to Pakistani aggression robustly though it clearly has no interest in starting a conflagration.
Feldman's words should have been: "Toe the line, or else..." That is the only language that some nations understand.
@Sam: Dream-On Sir!
Define 'normal'. If one country acts abnormally, the abnormal ties will be the 'normal'. If you have a contentious neighbor constantly trying to encroach upon your land, there are bound to be verbal jousts and occasional coming-to-blows, and that is 'normal'. Normal relationship is possible only where both countries are normal. Thus, in order to normalize the relationship, first the 'abnormal country' itself needs to be normalized.
This Feldman guy needs a reality check - such irresponsible statements from middle-level US envoys will only encourage Pakistan to continue sheltering more Osamas.....
Does Danial F Feldman think that US has "Normal" relationship with Pakistan? Stop trying to tie India to the failed state called Pakistan. Normalization of relations with Pakistan according to Pakistan means handing over Kashmir to them. It ain't going to happen ever. The only solution is for Pakistan to honor the UNSC resolution and pull its military and tribal invaders from Pakistan occupied Kashmir. Next step would be deploying India forces there to normalize the situation. Only after all this and getting the territory back from China can India think of anything else.
So we tried crying on his shoulders and his reply was pretty clear... India is going to be in the big league so we accept that and learn to live according to our size, and that US will not interfare in solving the K issue.. what do we get? What is the point in going around like cry baby in every forum and get slapped? Why cant we focus on internal problems first?