A culture of impunity

Freedom of the press is a concept that in many ways in Pakistan is both partial and conditional.


Editorial August 29, 2014

Though Pakistan is not a failed state, it has large areas which have become either paralysed or seemingly amputated. One such is the rule of law in Balochistan which to all intents and purposes lies beyond the Pale, that mythical fence beyond which darkness prevails. No crime is too heinous or too grisly to avoid prosecution. Murder, rape and robbery all happen with routine regularity, and now another three people, two of them journalists, have been killed as they sat in their office in Quetta. Irshad Mastoi was a senior journalist and Secretary General of the Balochistan Union of Journalists, Abdul Rasul was a trainee journalist and Mohammed Younus an accountant who was probably in the wrong place at the wrong time. All were shot multiple times in the head and chest and their two killers escaped, leaving the same way they came in. No group has claimed responsibility for the killings, no motive is known — at least on the surface.

Journalists lead dangerous lives in Pakistan generally, but more dangerous than most in Balochistan. This is one of the deadliest countries in the world for journalists intent on exposing corruption and malpractice, or simply reporting in an even-handed manner which ruffles the feathers of any number of armed groups that resent a critical eye being cast in their direction. ‘Reporters Without Borders’ issued its annual report in February 2014 which showed that four out of seven reporters killed in Pakistan in 2013 came from Balochistan. The report also stated that none of the cases had ever been thoroughly investigated, there had been no arrests in connection with any murder of a journalist anywhere in the country, and the successful prosecution of those who murder journalists is vanishingly small.

The Balochistan government was swift to issue a statement saying that it condemned the attack and that “it stands by journalists in this difficult time.” That is patently untrue. A falsehood. A lie. The Balochistan government provides no security for journalists anywhere in the province and never has. No murderer of a journalist has ever been brought to book, and the culture of impunity that typifies every aspect of the wholesale breach of the rule of law in the province, cloaks and protects the guilty. Journalists face daily threats to their lives and the lives of their families. Just how little the government of Balochistan cares for journalists is exemplified by the fact that the chief minister for Balochistan, Dr Malik Baloch, announced several months ago that he was forming a judicial tribunal to investigate the murders of journalists. Nothing has happened since. There is no committee, or if there is it is working completely incognito, and there are no reports of any investigations being carried out. The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists also condemned the attack and called for the arrest of the killers — a very faint hope.

Freedom of the press is a concept that in many ways in Pakistan is both partial and conditional. It is not just the murder of journalists, it is the way in which governments both provincial and federal choose to limit freedoms. Censorship may be imposed via the growth and maintenance of a culture of fear to speak out, or it may be by direct intervention, such as the blocking of YouTube for which there can now be no justification. The offices of this newspaper in Karachi have been attacked twice with guns and grenades, and staffers from our sister TV channel were murdered as they sat in their van. Press freedom is constrained also by self-censorship, with the media houses seeking to protect their employees by not treading on sensitive toes and all of this against the background of the culture of impunity. Until that is challenged and brought down the journalists of Pakistan will continue to pay with their lives as they tell the stories that some do not want to hear.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 30th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

Kasur wala | 9 years ago | Reply

For example take ET. It is a pro India paper. the comment section is littered with Indian trolls comment. These trolls gravitate to ET since they know their comments will be posted, by ET, without hesitation. Yet, Pro Pakistan comments or rebuttals to Indian paid trolls, are censured. This is so blatant that a person wonders what is going on here? Who owns this paper?

Feroz | 9 years ago | Reply

Is it slowly becoming clear as to why non State actors were created ? Locals falsely believed they were created to wage asymmetric warfare against neighbors. This is only partly true, they are also a vital instrument to keep the citizens who ask pointed questions silent. In the modern world the use of proxies to do the same job is called OUTSOURCING, in management jargon. When no culprit can be found, charged or prosecuted and the Police alongside Judiciary shows no inclination to pursue the matter, the invisible becomes visible to all except those with closed minds.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ