Tobacco advertisement: Philip Morris challenges SRO

Company argues health regulation a provincial matter and not a federal one.


Our Correspondent May 23, 2014
Tobacco manufacturers are not allowed to advertise their products on conventional channels, such as press and TV, according to an industry official. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI:


Philip Morris Pakistan Limited (PMPL) has challenged the federal government’s recent statutory regulatory order (SRO) regarding a complete ban on tobacco advertisement in the Sindh High Court (SHC), the company said in a press release on Friday.


The SRO 1086 (1) 2013, which was recently issued by the Federal Ministry of Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, prohibits advertisements of tobacco products – currently allowed albeit limitations – in their entirety, according to the company.

Tobacco manufacturers are not allowed to advertise their products on conventional channels, such as press and TV, according to an industry official.

However, the industry is permitted to advertise cigarette brands on the fascia of tobacco shops so long as it does not exceed its (current) legal limit of one square metre, the official added. “This also would be banned once the SRO under question becomes effective on May 31.”

“Philip Morris (Pakistan) Ltd. seeks to challenge the legality of the federal government’s SRO 1086 (1) 2013 because the authority to regulate health matters lies with the provinces, not the federal government,” the company said in an official statement.

The legality of it

Raising legal questions in its petition, the country’s second largest tobacco manufacturer said, “Since the 18th Amendment passed by the parliament in the year 2010 had devolved health as a subject to the provinces, the company believes that the courts should interpret the relevant constitutional provisions and declare whether the federal government can continue to issue regulations on health.”

However, the official said a section of press misquoted the company’s stance regarding the subject. The company challenged the SRO only against the banning of tobacco advertisement in its entirety, the official said.

The company supports all other regulatory measures or restrictions already in place on tobacco advertisement, the statement said.

“The company will not seek any reverse in regulations on tobacco advertisement and will keep supporting reasonable advertising regulations.”

Published in The Express Tribune, May 24th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (4)

Haroon Rashid | 9 years ago | Reply

@awGilani: As we are aware and compliment KSE listed tobacco group diversified tobacco business company/assets to Phillip Morris in Pakistan. The group with excellent reputation internationally and Pakistan realised to its responsibility for CSR and achieving UN-MDG hence they sold off to Phillip Morris. Phillip Morris and other international brands internationally following a Code of Conduct for advertisement on packaging of cigarette which is no printing/advertising of brand name on the cigarette box. Is Phillip Morris observing?

awGilani | 9 years ago | Reply

@Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed:

Philip Morris is more abiding to regulations/laws of the state than any of its competition in tobacco industry. Consider illegal brands/illicit trade, and tax evaders should be held accountable too.

Law is law, if it is out of federal govt's jurisdiction then the said company has the right to challenge and law should take it's course as long as tobacco business is legal in the country.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ